Core i9-13900F vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-13900F vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-13900F vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-13900F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $5,421 less on MSRP ($524 MSRP vs $5,945 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1006.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 93.4 vs 8.4 PassMark/$ ($524 MSRP vs $5,945 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 300W, a 235W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Platinum 8562Y+.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (48,934 vs 50,189).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 60 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8562Y+, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.

Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

2023

Why buy it

✅+2.6% higher PassMark.
✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (60 MB vs 36 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 93.4 PassMark/$ ($5,945 MSRP vs $524 MSRP).
❌361.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-13900F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-13900F better than Xeon Platinum 8562Y+?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-13900F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.6% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 66.7% larger total L3 cache (60 MB vs 36 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-13900F is the better buy right now. Core i9-13900F comes in $5,421 cheaper on MSRP at $524 MSRP versus $5,945 MSRP, and it still gives you a 19.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 2.6% better PassMark. It is also 1006.2% better value on MSRP (93.4 vs 8.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 66.7% larger total L3 cache (60 MB vs 36 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 24/32. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i9-13900F vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-13900F

The Core i9-13900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,934 points. Launch price was $524.

Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

The Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 50,189 points. Launch price was $5,945.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-13900F packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core i9-13900F versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ — a 29.2% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900F (base: 2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i9-13900F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900F scores 48,934 against the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+'s 50,189 — a 2.5% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900F vs 60 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+.

Feature	Core i9-13900F	Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
Cores / Threads	24 / 32	32 / 64+33%
Boost Clock	5.5 GHz+34%	4.1 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.8 GHz+40%
L3 Cache	36 MB (total)	60 MB (total)+67%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark	48,934	50,189+3%
Cinebench R23 Multi	37,326	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,801	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	17,199	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13900F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-13900F) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8562Y+). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900F) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8562Y+) — the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ offers 60 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1700 (Core i9-13900F) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8562Y+).

Feature	Core i9-13900F	Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
Socket	LGA1700	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	5600
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	4096 GB+2033%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	80+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ rivals EPYC 9474F.

Feature	Core i9-13900F	Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-13900F was priced at $524, while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ came in at $5945. On launch pricing ($524 vs $5945), Core i9-13900F was $5421 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900F delivers 93.4 pts/$ vs 8.4 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ — making the Core i9-13900F the 166.8% better value option.

Feature	Core i9-13900F	Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
MSRP	$524-91%	$5945
Performance per Dollar	93.4+1012%	8.4
Release Date	2023	2023

Search Core i9-13900F on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.