Core i9-13900F
EPYC 4465P
Core i9-13900F vs EPYC 4465P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-13900F vs EPYC 4465P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-13900F vs EPYC 4465P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-13900F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 4465P.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (48,934 vs 50,216).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4465P, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 93.4 vs 125.9 PassMark/$ ($524 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4465P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
EPYC 4465P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+2.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅Costs $125 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $524 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 34.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 125.9 vs 93.4 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $524 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-13900F.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4465P better than Core i9-13900F?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-13900F vs EPYC 4465P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core i9-13900F
The Core i9-13900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,934 points. Launch price was $524.
EPYC 4465P
The EPYC 4465P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 50,216 points. Launch price was $399.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13900F packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 4465P offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i9-13900F has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core i9-13900F versus 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4465P — a 1.8% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900F (base: 2 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i9-13900F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 4465P uses Grado (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900F scores 48,934 against the EPYC 4465P's 50,216 — a 2.6% lead for the EPYC 4465P. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900F vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4465P.
| Feature | Core i9-13900F | EPYC 4465P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32+100% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5.5 GHz+2% | 5.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 3.4 GHz+70% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+78% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Grado (2025) |
| PassMark | 48,934 | 50,216+3% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 37,326 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,801 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 17,199 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13900F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 4465P uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-13900F versus 5200 on the EPYC 4465P — the Core i9-13900F supports 7.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-13900F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900F) vs 28 (EPYC 4465P) — the EPYC 4465P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1700 (Core i9-13900F) and AM5 (EPYC 4465P).
| Feature | Core i9-13900F | EPYC 4465P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+8% | 5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Only the EPYC 4465P has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13900F) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4465P). The EPYC 4465P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Core i9-13900F requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4465P rivals Core i7-14700K.
| Feature | Core i9-13900F | EPYC 4465P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | AMD Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-13900F was priced at $524, while the EPYC 4465P came in at $399. On launch pricing ($524 vs $399), EPYC 4465P was $125 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900F delivers 93.4 pts/$ vs 125.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 4465P — making the EPYC 4465P the 29.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-13900F | EPYC 4465P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $524 | $399-24% |
| Performance per Dollar | 93.4 | 125.9+35% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i9-13900F and EPYC 4465P
