Core i9-13900F vs Xeon w7-3445

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-13900F vs Xeon w7-3445 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-13900F vs Xeon w7-3445: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-13900F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,465 less on MSRP ($524 MSRP vs $1,989 MSRP).
✅Delivers 279.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 93.4 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($524 MSRP vs $1,989 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 270W, a 205W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon w7-3445.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (48,934 vs 48,991).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 53 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w7-3445, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.

Xeon w7-3445

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅+45.8% larger total L3 cache (53 MB vs 36 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅460% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.6 vs 93.4 PassMark/$ ($1,989 MSRP vs $524 MSRP).
❌315.4% higher power demand at 270W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-13900F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-13900F better than Xeon w7-3445?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon w7-3445 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-13900F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w7-3445 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 20 cores and 40 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 45.8% larger total L3 cache (53 MB vs 36 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-13900F is the better buy right now. Core i9-13900F comes in $1,465 cheaper on MSRP at $524 MSRP versus $1,989 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon w7-3445 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.1% better PassMark. It is also 279.1% better value on MSRP (93.4 vs 24.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w7-3445 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Core i9-13900F vs Xeon w7-3445 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-13900F

The Core i9-13900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,934 points. Launch price was $524.

Xeon w7-3445

The Xeon w7-3445 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 52.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 48,991 points. Launch price was $1,989.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-13900F packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon w7-3445 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Core i9-13900F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core i9-13900F versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3445 — a 13.6% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900F (base: 2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i9-13900F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon w7-3445 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900F scores 48,934 against the Xeon w7-3445's 48,991 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon w7-3445. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900F vs 52.5 MB on the Xeon w7-3445.

Feature	Core i9-13900F	Xeon w7-3445
Cores / Threads	24 / 32+20%	20 / 40
Boost Clock	5.5 GHz+15%	4.8 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.6 GHz+30%
L3 Cache	36 MB (total)	52.5 MB+46%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	48,934	48,991
Cinebench R23 Multi	37,326	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,801	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	17,199	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13900F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w7-3445 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-13900F versus 4800 on the Xeon w7-3445 — the Core i9-13900F supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w7-3445 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-13900F) vs 8 (Xeon w7-3445). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900F) vs 112 (Xeon w7-3445) — the Xeon w7-3445 offers 92 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1700 (Core i9-13900F) and W790 (Xeon w7-3445).

Feature	Core i9-13900F	Xeon w7-3445
Socket	LGA1700	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+17%	4800
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	4096 GB+2033%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	112+460%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w7-3445 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon w7-3445 rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.

Feature	Core i9-13900F	Xeon w7-3445
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-13900F was priced at $524, while the Xeon w7-3445 came in at $1989. On launch pricing ($524 vs $1989), Core i9-13900F was $1465 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900F delivers 93.4 pts/$ vs 24.6 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-3445 — making the Core i9-13900F the 116.5% better value option.

Feature	Core i9-13900F	Xeon w7-3445
MSRP	$524-74%	$1989
Performance per Dollar	93.4+280%	24.6
Release Date	2023	2023

Search Core i9-13900F on Amazon

Search Xeon w7-3445 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.