EPYC 9224 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

AMD

EPYC 9224

24 Cores48 Thrd200 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2022
EPYC family
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

16 Cores32 Thrd280 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2022
Threadripper Pro family
···

EPYC 9224 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9224 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9224 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9224

2022

Why buy it

  • Draws 200W instead of 280W, a 80W reduction.
  • Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (48,573 vs 48,756).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 26.6 vs 61.0 PassMark/$ ($1,825 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +34.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $1,026 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $1,825 MSRP).
  • Delivers 129.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.0 vs 26.6 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $1,825 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 40% higher power demand at 280W vs 200W.
  • Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while EPYC 9224 moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX better than EPYC 9224?
Yes. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 34.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 34.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is the better buy right now. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX comes in $1,026 cheaper on MSRP at $799 MSRP versus $1,825 MSRP, and it still gives you a 34.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 129.3% better value on MSRP (61.0 vs 26.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9224 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of sWRX8. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

EPYC 9224 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 9224

The EPYC 9224 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 48,573 points. Launch price was $1,825.

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 March 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,756 points. Launch price was $499.

Processing Power

The EPYC 9224 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 9224 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9224 versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX — a 19.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX (base: 2.5 GHz vs 4 GHz). The EPYC 9224 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9224 scores 48,573 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX's 48,756 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9224 vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX.

FeatureEPYC 9224Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
Cores / Threads
24 / 48+50%
16 / 32
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz
4.5 GHz+22%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
4 GHz+60%
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)
64 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
512K (per core)+51100%
Process
5 nm, 6 nm-29%
7 nm
Architecture
Genoa (2022−2023)
Chagall PRO (2022)
PassMark
48,573
48,756
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9224 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9224 versus 3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX — the EPYC 9224 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9224 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 2048 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9224) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9224) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX).

FeatureEPYC 9224Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
Socket
SP5
sWRX8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
4800+50%
3200
Max RAM Capacity
6144+200%
2048
RAM Channels
12+50%
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 9224 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468X; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX rivals Xeon w5-3335.

FeatureEPYC 9224Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9224 was priced at $1825, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX came in at $799. On launch pricing ($1825 vs $799), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX was $1026 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9224 delivers 26.6 pts/$ vs 61.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX the 78.5% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9224Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
MSRP
$1825
$799-56%
Performance per Dollar
26.6
61.0+129%
Release Date
2022
2022

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.