
EPYC 9224

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
EPYC 9224 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9224 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9224 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9224
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 280W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (48,573 vs 48,756).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 26.6 vs 61.0 PassMark/$ ($1,825 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +34.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,026 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $1,825 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 129.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.0 vs 26.6 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $1,825 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌40% higher power demand at 280W vs 200W.
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while EPYC 9224 moves to SP5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX better than EPYC 9224?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9224 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9224
The EPYC 9224 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 48,573 points. Launch price was $1,825.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 March 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,756 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9224 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 9224 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9224 versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX — a 19.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX (base: 2.5 GHz vs 4 GHz). The EPYC 9224 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9224 scores 48,573 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX's 48,756 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9224 vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX.
| Feature | EPYC 9224 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+50% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4.5 GHz+22% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 4 GHz+60% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | 64 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Chagall PRO (2022) |
| PassMark | 48,573 | 48,756 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9224 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9224 versus 3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX — the EPYC 9224 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9224 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 2048 — 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9224) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9224) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX).
| Feature | EPYC 9224 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+50% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144+200% | 2048 |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 9224 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468X; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX rivals Xeon w5-3335.
| Feature | EPYC 9224 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9224 was priced at $1825, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX came in at $799. On launch pricing ($1825 vs $799), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX was $1026 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9224 delivers 26.6 pts/$ vs 61.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX the 78.5% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9224 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1825 | $799-56% |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.6 | 61.0+129% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














