EPYC 9224 vs Xeon Gold 6314U

EPYC 9224 vs Xeon Gold 6314U Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9224

24 / 48

48,573

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon Gold 6314U

32 / 64

48,916

+0.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9224 vs Xeon Gold 6314U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9224 vs Xeon Gold 6314U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9224

2022

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 48 MB).
✅Costs $1,152 less on MSRP ($1,825 MSRP vs $2,977 MSRP).
✅Delivers 62.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 26.6 vs 16.4 PassMark/$ ($1,825 MSRP vs $2,977 MSRP).
✅Draws 200W instead of 205W, a 5W reduction.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (48,573 vs 48,916).

Xeon Gold 6314U

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (48 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.4 vs 26.6 PassMark/$ ($2,977 MSRP vs $1,825 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while EPYC 9224 moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9224 better than Xeon Gold 6314U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 9224 is ahead with a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6314U pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark. EPYC 9224 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 48 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6314U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9224 is the better buy right now. EPYC 9224 comes in $1,152 cheaper on MSRP at $1,825 MSRP versus $2,977 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Gold 6314U is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.7% better PassMark. It is also 62.0% better value on MSRP (26.6 vs 16.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9224 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, and 33.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 48 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9224 vs Xeon Gold 6314U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9224

The EPYC 9224 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 48,573 points. Launch price was $1,825.

Xeon Gold 6314U

The Xeon Gold 6314U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,916 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9224 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6314U offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Gold 6314U has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9224 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6314U — a 8.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 9224 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The EPYC 9224 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6314U uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9224 scores 48,573 against the Xeon Gold 6314U's 48,916 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon Gold 6314U. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9224 vs 48 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6314U.

Feature	EPYC 9224	Xeon Gold 6314U
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	32 / 64+33%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+9%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+9%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+33%	48 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm, 6 nm-50%	10 nm
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	48,573	48,916

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9224 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6314U uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9224 versus 3200 on the Xeon Gold 6314U — the EPYC 9224 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9224 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9224) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6314U). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9224) and SP3,C621A (Xeon Gold 6314U).

Feature	EPYC 9224	Xeon Gold 6314U
Socket	SP5	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	4800+50%	3200
Max RAM Capacity	6144+50%	4096
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 9224) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6314U). Direct competitor: EPYC 9224 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468X; Xeon Gold 6314U rivals Xeon Platinum 8362.

Feature	EPYC 9224	Xeon Gold 6314U
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9224 was priced at $1825, while the Xeon Gold 6314U came in at $2977. On launch pricing ($1825 vs $2977), EPYC 9224 was $1152 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9224 delivers 26.6 pts/$ vs 16.4 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6314U — making the EPYC 9224 the 47.3% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9224	Xeon Gold 6314U
MSRP	$1825-39%	$2977
Performance per Dollar	26.6+62%	16.4
Release Date	2022	2021

Search EPYC 9224 on Amazon

Search Xeon Gold 6314U on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.