EPYC 9224 vs EPYC Embedded 8224P

EPYC 9224 vs EPYC Embedded 8224P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9224

24 / 48

48,573

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

EPYC Embedded 8224P

24 / 48

48,869

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9224 vs EPYC Embedded 8224P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9224 vs EPYC Embedded 8224P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9224

2022

Why buy it

✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (48,573 vs 48,869).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 26.6 vs 57.2 PassMark/$ ($1,825 MSRP vs $855 MSRP).
❌25% higher power demand at 200W vs 160W.

EPYC Embedded 8224P

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $970 less on MSRP ($855 MSRP vs $1,825 MSRP).
✅Delivers 114.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 57.2 vs 26.6 PassMark/$ ($855 MSRP vs $1,825 MSRP).
✅Draws 160W instead of 200W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC Embedded 8224P better than EPYC 9224?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 9224 is ahead with a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC Embedded 8224P pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC Embedded 8224P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC Embedded 8224P is the better buy right now. EPYC Embedded 8224P comes in $970 cheaper on MSRP at $855 MSRP versus $1,825 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. The compromise is that EPYC 9224 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 114.8% better value on MSRP (57.2 vs 26.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC Embedded 8224P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 24/48. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 9224 vs EPYC Embedded 8224P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9224

The EPYC 9224 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 48,573 points. Launch price was $1,825.

EPYC Embedded 8224P

The EPYC Embedded 8224P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 48,869 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 9224 and EPYC Embedded 8224P share an identical 24-core/48-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9224 versus 3 GHz on the EPYC Embedded 8224P — a 20.9% clock advantage for the EPYC 9224 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.55 GHz). The EPYC 9224 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the EPYC Embedded 8224P uses Siena (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9224 scores 48,573 against the EPYC Embedded 8224P's 48,869 — a 0.6% lead for the EPYC Embedded 8224P. Both processors carry 64 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	EPYC 9224	EPYC Embedded 8224P
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	24 / 48
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+23%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.55 GHz+2%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)	64 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm, 6 nm	5 nm
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Siena (2023−2024)
PassMark	48,573	48,869

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9224 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC Embedded 8224P uses SP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9224 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 1152 — 433.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9224) vs 6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9224) vs 96 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) — the EPYC 9224 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9224) and SP6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P).

Feature	EPYC 9224	EPYC Embedded 8224P
Socket	SP5	SP6
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	4800	4800
Max RAM Capacity	6144+433%	1152
RAM Channels	12+100%	6
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+33%	96

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 9224 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468X; EPYC Embedded 8224P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y.

Feature	EPYC 9224	EPYC Embedded 8224P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9224 was priced at $1825, while the EPYC Embedded 8224P came in at $855. On launch pricing ($1825 vs $855), EPYC Embedded 8224P was $970 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9224 delivers 26.6 pts/$ vs 57.2 pts/$ for the EPYC Embedded 8224P — making the EPYC Embedded 8224P the 72.9% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9224	EPYC Embedded 8224P
MSRP	$1825	$855-53%
Performance per Dollar	26.6	57.2+115%
Release Date	2022	2023

Search EPYC 9224 on Amazon

Search EPYC Embedded 8224P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.