Core Ultra 7 265HX
VS
EPYC 9224

Core Ultra 7 265HX vs EPYC 9224

Intel

Core Ultra 7 265HX

20 Cores20 Thrd55 WWMax: 5.3 GHz2025
VS
AMD

EPYC 9224

24 Cores48 Thrd200 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2022

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265HX

#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
123%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
121%
#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
115%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
110%
#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
100%
#31
Ryzen 5 230
MSRP: $200|Avg: $190
93%
#36
Core i5-11500B
MSRP: $185|Avg: $185
85%
#42
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
MSRP: $749|Avg: N/A
81%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9224

#308
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
MSRP: $1149|Avg: $100
109%
#309
Xeon W-2255
MSRP: $778|Avg: $350
109%
#310
Xeon Silver 4316
MSRP: $1126|Avg: $1200
109%
#311
Xeon w7-3545
MSRP: $2039|Avg: $2039
108%
#312
EPYC 7643P
MSRP: $2722|Avg: $2722
107%
#313
Xeon w5-3435X
MSRP: $1589|Avg: $163
107%
#314
Xeon Gold 6312U
MSRP: $1645|Avg: N/A
106%
#315
EPYC 7443
MSRP: $2010|Avg: $1800
106%
#316
Xeon Gold 6416H
MSRP: $1845|Avg: N/A
106%
#318
EPYC 7343
MSRP: $1565|Avg: $1350
105%
#319
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $225
104%
#320
EPYC 7413
MSRP: $1825|Avg: $450
104%
#321
Xeon W-3335
MSRP: $1430|Avg: $1200
103%
#322
EPYC 9354P
MSRP: $2730|Avg: $2205
103%
#323
EPYC 9224
MSRP: $1825|Avg: $1199
100%
#324
Xeon Gold 6423N
MSRP: $2161|Avg: $2161
100%
#325
Xeon w7-3565X
MSRP: $2689|Avg: $2850
99%
#326
Xeon W-1290TE
MSRP: $552|Avg: $552
99%
#328
Xeon w7-2495X
MSRP: $2189|Avg: $2900
98%
#329
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
MSRP: $4099|Avg: $4182
97%
#331
EPYC 7402
MSRP: $1783|Avg: $2285
97%
#332
Xeon W-2235
MSRP: $555|Avg: $350
96%
#333
Xeon Gold 5317
MSRP: $1088|Avg: $1100
95%
#334
Xeon W-2275
MSRP: $1112|Avg: $500
95%
#335
Xeon Gold 6430
MSRP: $2128|Avg: $1850
94%
#336
Xeon Gold 6421N
MSRP: $2368|Avg: $2427
93%
#337
EPYC 7F72
MSRP: $2131|Avg: $2131
93%
#338
Xeon W-2265
MSRP: $1039|Avg: $663
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($1,199) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 9224 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore Ultra 7 265HXEPYC 9224
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($450)
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,199)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-HX (2025) / 3 nm)
✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core Ultra 7 265HX ($450), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($749 less, 62% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore Ultra 7 265HXEPYC 9224
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+169%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($450)
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,199)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 265HX and EPYC 9224

Intel

Core Ultra 7 265HX

The Core Ultra 7 265HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2114. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 48,975 points. Launch price was $500.

AMD

EPYC 9224

The EPYC 9224 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 48,573 points. Launch price was $1,825.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 265HX packs 20 cores / 20 threads, while the EPYC 9224 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 9224 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265HX versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9224 — a 35.6% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265HX (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 265HX uses the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture (3 nm), while the EPYC 9224 uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 265HX scores 48,975 against the EPYC 9224's 48,573 — a 0.8% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265HX. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 265HX vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9224.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 265HXEPYC 9224
Cores / Threads
20 / 20
24 / 48+20%
Boost Clock
5.3 GHz+43%
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
2.6 GHz+4%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
30 MB (total)
64 MB (total)+113%
L2 Cache
3 MB (per core)+200%
1 MB (per core)
Process
3 nm-40%
5 nm, 6 nm
Architecture
Arrow Lake-HX (2025)
Genoa (2022−2023)
PassMark
48,975
48,573
Geekbench 6 Single
2,990
Geekbench 6 Multi
17,417
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 265HX uses the FCBGA2114 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 9224 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 265HX versus 4800 on the EPYC 9224 — the EPYC 9224 supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9224 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 192 GB 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 7 265HX) vs 12 (EPYC 9224). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core Ultra 7 265HX) vs 128 (EPYC 9224) — the EPYC 9224 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WM880,HM870 (Core Ultra 7 265HX) and SP5 (EPYC 9224).

FeatureCore Ultra 7 265HXEPYC 9224
Socket
FCBGA2114
SP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6400
4800+95900%
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB+3276700%
6144
RAM Channels
2
12+500%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
128+540%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core Ultra 7 265HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 265HX) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 9224). The Core Ultra 7 265HX includes integrated graphics (Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU), while the EPYC 9224 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 9224 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468X.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 265HXEPYC 9224
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU
None
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
💰

Value Analysis

The Core Ultra 7 265HX launched at $450 MSRP, while the EPYC 9224 debuted at $1825.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 265HXEPYC 9224
MSRP
$450-75%
$1825
Avg Price (30d)
$1199
Release Date
2025
2022