Core Ultra 7 265F vs Core Ultra 7 265HX
Core Ultra 7 265F
Core Ultra 7 265HX
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265F
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265HX
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 265F | Core Ultra 7 265HX |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($276) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($450) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-HX (2025) / 3 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 265F | Core Ultra 7 265HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+64%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($276) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($450) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 265F and Core Ultra 7 265HX
Core Ultra 7 265F
The Core Ultra 7 265F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 49,161 points. Launch price was $379.
Core Ultra 7 265HX
The Core Ultra 7 265HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2114. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 48,975 points. Launch price was $500.
Processing Power
Both the Core Ultra 7 265F and Core Ultra 7 265HX share an identical 20-core/20-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265F versus 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265HX — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 265F uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 265HX uses Arrow Lake-HX (2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 265F scores 49,161 against the Core Ultra 7 265HX's 48,975 — a 0.4% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,000 vs 2,990, a 0.3% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 20,000 vs 17,417 (13.8% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265F). Both processors carry 30 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265F | Core Ultra 7 265HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz | 5.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.6 GHz+8% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 30 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Arrow Lake-HX (2025) |
| PassMark | 49,161 | 48,975 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 25,459 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,000 | 2,990 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 20,000+15% | 17,417 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 265F uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 7 265HX uses FCBGA2114 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Core Ultra 7 265F supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 7 265F) vs 20 (Core Ultra 7 265HX) — the Core Ultra 7 265F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z890,B860,H810 (Core Ultra 7 265F) and WM880,HM870 (Core Ultra 7 265HX).
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265F | Core Ultra 7 265HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | FCBGA2114 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+33% | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 24+20% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Core Ultra 7 265HX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core Ultra 7 265HX includes integrated graphics (Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU), while the Core Ultra 7 265F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 265F targets High Performance Gaming.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265F | Core Ultra 7 265HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | High Performance Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Core Ultra 7 265F launched at $369 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 7 265HX debuted at $450.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265F | Core Ultra 7 265HX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $369-18% | $450 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $276 | — |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 7 265F and Core Ultra 7 265HX
