Core Ultra 7 265F vs Core i7-13700K
Core Ultra 7 265F
Core i7-13700K
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265F
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-13700K
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 265F | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($276) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($400) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 265F | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+56%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($276) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($400) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 265F and Core i7-13700K
Core Ultra 7 265F
The Core Ultra 7 265F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 49,161 points. Launch price was $379.
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 265F packs 20 cores / 20 threads, while the Core i7-13700K offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the Core Ultra 7 265F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265F versus 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K — a 1.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 265F uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Core i7-13700K uses Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 265F scores 49,161 against the Core i7-13700K's 45,784 — a 7.1% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 25,459 vs 31,000 (19.6% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,000 vs 2,846, a 5.3% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 20,000 vs 18,980 (5.2% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265F). Both processors carry 30 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265F | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 20+25% | 16 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz | 5.4 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.4 GHz+42% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 30 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+50% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) |
| PassMark | 49,161+7% | 45,784 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 25,459 | 31,000+22% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,000+5% | 2,846 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 20,000+5% | 18,980 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 265F uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-13700K uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Core Ultra 7 265F supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 7 265F) vs 20 (Core i7-13700K) — the Core Ultra 7 265F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z890,B860,H810 (Core Ultra 7 265F) and Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K).
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265F | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+33% | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 24+20% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 265F) vs true (Core i7-13700K). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Core Ultra 7 265F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 265F targets High Performance Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265F | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
| Target Use | High Performance Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Core Ultra 7 265F launched at $369 MSRP, while the Core i7-13700K debuted at $409. At current prices ($276 vs $400), the Core Ultra 7 265F is $124 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 7 265F delivers 178.1 pts/$ vs 114.5 pts/$ for the Core i7-13700K — making the Core Ultra 7 265F the 43.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265F | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $369-10% | $409 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $276-31% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 178.1+56% | 114.5 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 7 265F and Core i7-13700K
