Core Ultra 7 265F vs Core i9-13900F
Core Ultra 7 265F
Core i9-13900F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265F
Performance Per Dollar Core i9-13900F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 265F | Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($276) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($536) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 265F | Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+95%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($276) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($536) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 265F and Core i9-13900F
Core Ultra 7 265F
The Core Ultra 7 265F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 49,161 points. Launch price was $379.
Core i9-13900F
The Core i9-13900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,934 points. Launch price was $524.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 265F packs 20 cores / 20 threads, while the Core i9-13900F offers 24 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-13900F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265F versus 5.5 GHz on the Core i9-13900F — a 3.7% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900F (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 265F uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Core i9-13900F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 265F scores 49,161 against the Core i9-13900F's 48,934 — a 0.5% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 25,459 vs 37,326 (37.8% advantage for the Core i9-13900F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,000 vs 2,801, a 6.9% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 20,000 vs 17,199 (15.1% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265F). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 265F vs 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900F.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265F | Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 20 | 24 / 32+20% |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz | 5.5 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz+20% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 36 MB (total)+20% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+50% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 49,161 | 48,934 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 25,459 | 37,326+47% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,000+7% | 2,801 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 20,000+16% | 17,199 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 265F uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-13900F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Core Ultra 7 265F supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 7 265F) vs 20 (Core i9-13900F) — the Core Ultra 7 265F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z890,B860,H810 (Core Ultra 7 265F) and LGA1700 (Core i9-13900F).
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265F | Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+33% | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 24+20% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core Ultra 7 265F has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i9-13900F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 265F targets High Performance Gaming.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265F | Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | High Performance Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Core Ultra 7 265F launched at $369 MSRP, while the Core i9-13900F debuted at $524. At current prices ($276 vs $536), the Core Ultra 7 265F is $260 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 7 265F delivers 178.1 pts/$ vs 91.3 pts/$ for the Core i9-13900F — making the Core Ultra 7 265F the 64.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265F | Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $369-30% | $524 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $276-49% | $536 |
| Performance per Dollar | 178.1+95% | 91.3 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 7 265F and Core i9-13900F
