Core Ultra 7 265F
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
Core Ultra 7 265F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 7 265F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 7 265F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 7 265F
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,030 less on MSRP ($369 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 274.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 133.2 vs 35.6 PassMark/$ ($369 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (49,161 vs 49,756).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 35.6 vs 133.2 PassMark/$ ($1,399 MSRP vs $369 MSRP).
- ❌438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX better than Core Ultra 7 265F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 7 265F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core Ultra 7 265F
The Core Ultra 7 265F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 49,161 points. Launch price was $379.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 49,756 points. Launch price was $1,399.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 265F packs 20 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core Ultra 7 265F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265F versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.4 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 265F uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 265F scores 49,161 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX's 49,756 — a 1.2% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 265F vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 20+67% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz | 5.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 4.7 GHz+96% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+113% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+200% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-40% | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Storm Peak (2023) |
| PassMark | 49,161 | 49,756+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 25,459 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 20,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 265F uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 265F versus 5200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX — the Core Ultra 7 265F supports 23.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 7 265F) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX). PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 7 265F) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z890,B860,H810 (Core Ultra 7 265F) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX).
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400+23% | 5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 2048 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 128+433% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 265F) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX). Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 265F targets High Performance Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX rivals Xeon w5-3435X.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
| Target Use | High Performance Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core Ultra 7 265F was priced at $369, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX came in at $1399. On launch pricing ($369 vs $1399), Core Ultra 7 265F was $1030 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 7 265F delivers 133.2 pts/$ vs 35.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX — making the Core Ultra 7 265F the 115.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $369-74% | $1399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 133.2+274% | 35.6 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 7 265F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
