Core Ultra 7 265F vs EPYC 7532
Core Ultra 7 265F
EPYC 7532
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265F
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7532
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 265F | EPYC 7532 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($276) | ✅ More affordable ($225) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 265F | EPYC 7532 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+27%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($276) | ✅ More affordable ($225) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 265F and EPYC 7532
Core Ultra 7 265F
The Core Ultra 7 265F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 49,161 points. Launch price was $379.
EPYC 7532
The EPYC 7532 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2020-02-19. It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 50,726 points. Launch price was $2,300.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 265F packs 20 cores / 20 threads, while the EPYC 7532 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7532 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265F versus 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7532 — a 46.5% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265F (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 265F uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the EPYC 7532 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 265F scores 49,161 against the EPYC 7532's 50,726 — a 3.1% lead for the EPYC 7532. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 265F vs 256 MB on the EPYC 7532.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265F | EPYC 7532 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 20 | 32 / 64+60% |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+61% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 256 MB+753% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core) | 16 MB+433% |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 49,161 | 50,726+3% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 25,459 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 20,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 265F uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7532 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 265F versus 3200 on the EPYC 7532 — the EPYC 7532 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7532 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 256 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 7 265F) vs 8 (EPYC 7532). PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 7 265F) vs 128 (EPYC 7532) — the EPYC 7532 offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z890,B860,H810 (Core Ultra 7 265F) and SP3 (EPYC 7532).
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265F | EPYC 7532 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | 3200+63900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+6553500% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 128+433% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core Ultra 7 265F has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 7532 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 265F targets High Performance Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 7532 rivals Xeon Gold 6338.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265F | EPYC 7532 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | High Performance Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Core Ultra 7 265F launched at $369 MSRP, while the EPYC 7532 debuted at $2380. At current prices ($276 vs $225), the EPYC 7532 is $51 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 7 265F delivers 178.1 pts/$ vs 225.4 pts/$ for the EPYC 7532 — making the EPYC 7532 the 23.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265F | EPYC 7532 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $369-84% | $2380 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $276 | $225-18% |
| Performance per Dollar | 178.1 | 225.4+27% |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 7 265F and EPYC 7532
