Core Ultra 7 265HX
VS
EPYC Embedded 8224P

Core Ultra 7 265HX vs EPYC Embedded 8224P

Intel

Core Ultra 7 265HX

20 Cores20 Thrd55 WWMax: 5.3 GHz2025
VS
AMD

EPYC Embedded 8224P

24 Cores48 Thrd160 WWMax: 3 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265HX

#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
123%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
121%
#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
115%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
110%
#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
100%
#31
Ryzen 5 230
MSRP: $200|Avg: $190
93%
#36
Core i5-11500B
MSRP: $185|Avg: $185
85%
#42
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
MSRP: $749|Avg: N/A
81%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC Embedded 8224P

#169
Xeon E-2356G
MSRP: $311|Avg: $544
104%
#171
Xeon W-2140B
MSRP: $294|Avg: $99
103%
#176
Xeon 6325P
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
102%
#178
Xeon Silver 4510
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
102%
#179
Xeon W-3223
MSRP: $294|Avg: $294
101%
#182
EPYC Embedded 8224P
MSRP: $855|Avg: $1048
100%
#187
Xeon Gold 5520+
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $764
99%
#188
EPYC 8124P
MSRP: $639|Avg: $639
99%
#196
Xeon 6515P
MSRP: $740|Avg: $886
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($1,048) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC Embedded 8224P is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore Ultra 7 265HXEPYC Embedded 8224P
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($450)
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,048)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-HX (2025) / 3 nm)
✨ Modern (Siena (2023−2024) / 5 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core Ultra 7 265HX ($450), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($598 less, 57% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore Ultra 7 265HXEPYC Embedded 8224P
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+133%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($450)
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,048)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 265HX and EPYC Embedded 8224P

Intel

Core Ultra 7 265HX

The Core Ultra 7 265HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2114. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 48,975 points. Launch price was $500.

AMD

EPYC Embedded 8224P

The EPYC Embedded 8224P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 48,869 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 265HX packs 20 cores / 20 threads, while the EPYC Embedded 8224P offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC Embedded 8224P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265HX versus 3 GHz on the EPYC Embedded 8224P — a 55.4% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265HX (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.55 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 265HX uses the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture (3 nm), while the EPYC Embedded 8224P uses Siena (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 265HX scores 48,975 against the EPYC Embedded 8224P's 48,869 — a 0.2% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265HX. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 265HX vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC Embedded 8224P.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 265HXEPYC Embedded 8224P
Cores / Threads
20 / 20
24 / 48+20%
Boost Clock
5.3 GHz+77%
3 GHz
Base Clock
2.6 GHz+2%
2.55 GHz
L3 Cache
30 MB (total)
64 MB (total)+113%
L2 Cache
3 MB (per core)+200%
1 MB (per core)
Process
3 nm-40%
5 nm
Architecture
Arrow Lake-HX (2025)
Siena (2023−2024)
PassMark
48,975
48,869
Geekbench 6 Single
2,990
Geekbench 6 Multi
17,417
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 265HX uses the FCBGA2114 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC Embedded 8224P uses SP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 265HX versus 4800 on the EPYC Embedded 8224P — the EPYC Embedded 8224P supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC Embedded 8224P supports up to 1152 of RAM compared to 192 GB 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 7 265HX) vs 6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core Ultra 7 265HX) vs 96 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) — the EPYC Embedded 8224P offers 76 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WM880,HM870 (Core Ultra 7 265HX) and SP6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P).

FeatureCore Ultra 7 265HXEPYC Embedded 8224P
Socket
FCBGA2114
SP6
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6400
4800+95900%
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB+17476167%
1152
RAM Channels
2
6+200%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
96+380%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core Ultra 7 265HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 265HX) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC Embedded 8224P). The Core Ultra 7 265HX includes integrated graphics (Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU), while the EPYC Embedded 8224P requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC Embedded 8224P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 265HXEPYC Embedded 8224P
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU
None
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
💰

Value Analysis

The Core Ultra 7 265HX launched at $450 MSRP, while the EPYC Embedded 8224P debuted at $855.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 265HXEPYC Embedded 8224P
MSRP
$450-47%
$855
Avg Price (30d)
$1048
Release Date
2025
2023