
Core Ultra 7 265HX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
Core Ultra 7 265HX vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 7 265HX vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 7 265HX vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 7 265HX
2025Why buy it
- β Costs $949 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
- β Delivers 206.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 108.8 vs 35.6 PassMark/$ ($450 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
- β Draws 55W instead of 350W, a 295W reduction.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (48,975 vs 49,756).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
2023Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +8.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- β 540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 35.6 vs 108.8 PassMark/$ ($1,399 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- β536.4% higher power demand at 350W vs 55W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 265HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX better than Core Ultra 7 265HX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 7 265HX vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 7 265HX
The Core Ultra 7 265HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2114. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 48,975 points. Launch price was $500.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 49,756 points. Launch price was $1,399.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 265HX packs 20 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX offers 12 cores / 24 threads β the Core Ultra 7 265HX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265HX versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX β identical boost frequencies (base: 2.6 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 265HX uses the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 265HX scores 48,975 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX's 49,756 β a 1.6% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 265HX vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265HX | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 20+67% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz | 5.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 4.7 GHz+81% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+113% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+200% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-40% | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-HX (2025) | Storm Peak (2023) |
| PassMark | 48,975 | 49,756+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,990 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 17,417 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 265HX uses the FCBGA2114 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 265HX versus 5200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX β the Core Ultra 7 265HX supports 23.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB β 966.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 7 265HX) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core Ultra 7 265HX) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX) β the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WM880,HM870 (Core Ultra 7 265HX) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX).
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265HX | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2114 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400+23% | 5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 2048 GB+967% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 265HX) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX). The Core Ultra 7 265HX includes integrated graphics (Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX rivals Xeon w5-3435X.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265HX | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core Ultra 7 265HX was priced at $450, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX came in at $1399. On launch pricing ($450 vs $1399), Core Ultra 7 265HX was $949 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 7 265HX delivers 108.8 pts/$ vs 35.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX β making the Core Ultra 7 265HX the 101.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265HX | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $450-68% | $1399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 108.8+206% | 35.6 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














