Core Ultra 7 265HX
VS
Xeon 6736P

Core Ultra 7 265HX vs Xeon 6736P

Intel

Core Ultra 7 265HX

20 Cores20 Thrd55 WWMax: 5.3 GHz2025
VS
Intel

Xeon 6736P

36 Cores72 Thrd205 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265HX

#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
123%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
121%
#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
115%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
110%
#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
100%
#31
Ryzen 5 230
MSRP: $200|Avg: $190
93%
#36
Core i5-11500B
MSRP: $185|Avg: $185
85%
#42
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
MSRP: $749|Avg: N/A
81%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon 6736P

#405
Xeon 6737P
MSRP: $4995|Avg: $4995
107%
#406
Xeon Gold 6342
MSRP: $2977|Avg: $3000
106%
#407
Xeon Gold 6438N
MSRP: $3351|Avg: $3351
105%
#408
Xeon 6747P
MSRP: $6497|Avg: $6497
105%
#410
Xeon W-3175X
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $2999
103%
#411
Xeon w9-3495X
MSRP: $5889|Avg: $6333
103%
#412
Xeon Gold 5320T
MSRP: $1977|Avg: $1379
102%
#413
EPYC 7643
MSRP: $4995|Avg: $2750
102%
#414
Xeon Gold 6330N
MSRP: $2389|Avg: $1798
102%
#415
EPYC 7473X
MSRP: $3900|Avg: $200
102%
#416
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
MSRP: $5489|Avg: $3486
101%
#417
EPYC 9474F
MSRP: $6780|Avg: $3723
101%
#418
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
MSRP: $11699|Avg: $11699
101%
#419
Xeon 6736P
MSRP: $3351|Avg: $3351
100%
#420
EPYC 9655P
MSRP: $10811|Avg: $7958
99%
#421
EPYC 9554P
MSRP: $7104|Avg: $3052
99%
#423
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
MSRP: $6499|Avg: $3444
98%
#424
Xeon W-2155
MSRP: $1440|Avg: $150
97%
#425
Xeon 6740E
MSRP: $5265|Avg: $3949
97%
#425
Xeon Gold 6348
MSRP: $3583|Avg: $2097
97%
#427
EPYC 7702P
MSRP: $4425|Avg: N/A
96%
#428
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9879.97
96%
#429
EPYC 7552
MSRP: $4025|Avg: $1650
95%
#431
Xeon Platinum 8360Y
MSRP: $5383|Avg: N/A
95%
#432
Xeon W-3245
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1200
95%
#433
Xeon Gold 6346
MSRP: $2708|Avg: $2195
93%
#434
Xeon W-3225
MSRP: $1319|Avg: $850
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($3,351) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon 6736P is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore Ultra 7 265HXXeon 6736P
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($450)
⚠️ Higher cost ($3,351)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-HX (2025) / 3 nm)
✨ Modern (Granite Rapids (2024−2025) / Intel 3 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core Ultra 7 265HX ($450), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($2,901 less, 87% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore Ultra 7 265HXXeon 6736P
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+628%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($450)
⚠️ Higher cost ($3,351)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 265HX and Xeon 6736P

Intel

Core Ultra 7 265HX

The Core Ultra 7 265HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2114. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 48,975 points. Launch price was $500.

Intel

Xeon 6736P

The Xeon 6736P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 36 cores and 72 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 50,072 points. Launch price was $3,351.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 265HX packs 20 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon 6736P offers 36 cores / 72 threads — the Xeon 6736P has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265HX versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon 6736P — a 25.5% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265HX (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 265HX uses the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Xeon 6736P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 265HX scores 48,975 against the Xeon 6736P's 50,072 — a 2.2% lead for the Xeon 6736P. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 265HX vs 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6736P.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 265HXXeon 6736P
Cores / Threads
20 / 20
36 / 72+80%
Boost Clock
5.3 GHz+29%
4.1 GHz
Base Clock
2.6 GHz+30%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
30 MB (total)
144 MB (total)+380%
L2 Cache
3 MB (per core)+50%
2 MB (per core)
Process
3 nm
Intel 3 nm
Architecture
Arrow Lake-HX (2025)
Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark
48,975
50,072+2%
Geekbench 6 Single
2,990
Geekbench 6 Multi
17,417
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 265HX uses the FCBGA2114 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6736P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 265HX versus 6400 on the Xeon 6736P — the Xeon 6736P supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6736P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 GB 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 7 265HX) vs 8 (Xeon 6736P). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core Ultra 7 265HX) vs 88 (Xeon 6736P) — the Xeon 6736P offers 68 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WM880,HM870 (Core Ultra 7 265HX) and Granite Rapids-SP (Xeon 6736P).

FeatureCore Ultra 7 265HXXeon 6736P
Socket
FCBGA2114
LGA4710
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6400
6400+127900%
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB+4915100%
4096
RAM Channels
2
8+300%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
88+340%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core Ultra 7 265HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core Ultra 7 265HX includes integrated graphics (Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU), while the Xeon 6736P requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Xeon 6736P rivals EPYC 9684X.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 265HXXeon 6736P
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU
None
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

The Core Ultra 7 265HX launched at $450 MSRP, while the Xeon 6736P debuted at $3351.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 265HXXeon 6736P
MSRP
$450-87%
$3351
Avg Price (30d)
$3351
Release Date
2025
2025