
EPYC 9115

EPYC 9224
EPYC 9115 vs EPYC 9224 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9115 vs EPYC 9224 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9115 vs EPYC 9224: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9115
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,099 less on MSRP ($726 MSRP vs $1,825 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 150.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 66.6 vs 26.6 PassMark/$ ($726 MSRP vs $1,825 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 200W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9224 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (48,343 vs 48,573).
EPYC 9224
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 26.6 vs 66.6 PassMark/$ ($1,825 MSRP vs $726 MSRP).
- ❌60% higher power demand at 200W vs 125W.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9224 better than EPYC 9115?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9115 vs EPYC 9224 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9115
The EPYC 9115 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 48,343 points. Launch price was $726.

EPYC 9224
The EPYC 9224 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 48,573 points. Launch price was $1,825.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9115 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 9224 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 9224 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9115 versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9224 — a 10.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9115 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 9115 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 9224 uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9115 scores 48,343 against the EPYC 9224's 48,573 — a 0.5% lead for the EPYC 9224. Both processors carry 64 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 9115 | EPYC 9224 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 24 / 48+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz+11% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz+4% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-20% | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 48,343 | 48,573 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. Both support up to 6144 of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9115) and SP5 (EPYC 9224).
| Feature | EPYC 9115 | EPYC 9224 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 | 6144 |
| RAM Channels | 12 | 12 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 9115 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468X; EPYC 9224 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468X.
| Feature | EPYC 9115 | EPYC 9224 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9115 was priced at $726, while the EPYC 9224 came in at $1825. On launch pricing ($726 vs $1825), EPYC 9115 was $1099 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9115 delivers 66.6 pts/$ vs 26.6 pts/$ for the EPYC 9224 — making the EPYC 9115 the 85.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9115 | EPYC 9224 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $726-60% | $1825 |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.6+150% | 26.6 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















