Core i9-13900F
VS
EPYC 9115

Core i9-13900F vs EPYC 9115

Intel

Core i9-13900F

24 Cores32 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.5 GHz2023
VS
AMD

EPYC 9115

16 Cores32 Thrd125 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2024

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i9-13900F

#192
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
MSRP: $99|Avg: $70
107%
#193
Core i9-12900F
MSRP: $494|Avg: $370
106%
#194
Core i5-12400
MSRP: $209|Avg: $195
106%
#195
Ryzen 5 7400
MSRP: $229|Avg: $229
105%
#196
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $589
105%
#197
Ryzen 5 5600X3D
MSRP: $229|Avg: $229
105%
#198
Core i3-9350KF
MSRP: $173|Avg: $80
104%
#199
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE
MSRP: $220|Avg: $220
104%
#200
Core i3-9300
MSRP: $143|Avg: $75
104%
#201
Ryzen 7 3800XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $249
103%
#202
Core i5-11400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $140
102%
#203
Core i3-10305
MSRP: $149|Avg: $100
101%
#204
Core i3-9320
MSRP: $154|Avg: $80
101%
#205
Core i3-10105
MSRP: $122|Avg: $90
100%
#206
Core i3-13100E
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#207
Core i9-13900F
MSRP: $524|Avg: $536
100%
#208
Processor 300
MSRP: $82|Avg: $80
99%
#209
Ryzen 5 2600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $145
99%
#210
Ryzen 5 2400GE
MSRP: $169|Avg: $80
99%
#211
Core i9-14900KS
MSRP: $749|Avg: $670
99%
#212
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
MSRP: $449|Avg: $384
98%
#213
Core i3-8100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $59
98%
#214
Core i7-13700E
MSRP: $390|Avg: $380
98%
#215
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G
MSRP: $430|Avg: $270
97%
#216
Core i7-9700
MSRP: $333|Avg: $150
96%
#217
Core i5-13500TE
MSRP: $235|Avg: $250
96%
#218
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
MSRP: $294|Avg: $76
96%
#219
Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
95%
#220
Athlon PRO 300GE
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
95%
#221
Athlon Gold 3150G
MSRP: $100|Avg: $80
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9115

#115
Xeon W-1370
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
107%
#119
Xeon 6505P
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
105%
#130
EPYC 9115
MSRP: $726|Avg: $726
100%
#131
EPYC 74F3
MSRP: $913|Avg: $824
100%
#143
Xeon W-1350P
MSRP: $311|Avg: $250
95%
#145
Xeon 6511P
MSRP: $815|Avg: $815
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($726) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 9115 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore i9-13900FEPYC 9115
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($536)
⚠️ Higher cost ($726)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm)
✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i9-13900F ($536), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($190 less, 26% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore i9-13900FEPYC 9115
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+37%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($536)
⚠️ Higher cost ($726)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13900F and EPYC 9115

Intel

Core i9-13900F

The Core i9-13900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,934 points. Launch price was $524.

AMD

EPYC 9115

The EPYC 9115 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 48,343 points. Launch price was $726.

Processing Power

The Core i9-13900F packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 9115 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-13900F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core i9-13900F versus 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9115 — a 29.2% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900F (base: 2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i9-13900F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 9115 uses Turin (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900F scores 48,934 against the EPYC 9115's 48,343 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i9-13900F. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900F vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9115.

FeatureCore i9-13900FEPYC 9115
Cores / Threads
24 / 32+50%
16 / 32
Boost Clock
5.5 GHz+34%
4.1 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.6 GHz+30%
L3 Cache
36 MB (total)
64 MB (total)+78%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Turin (2024)
PassMark
48,934+1%
48,343
Cinebench R23 Multi
37,326
Geekbench 6 Single
2,801
Geekbench 6 Multi
17,199
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13900F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 9115 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-13900F versus 4800 on the EPYC 9115 — the EPYC 9115 supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9115 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 192 GB 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-13900F) vs 12 (EPYC 9115). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900F) vs 128 (EPYC 9115) — the EPYC 9115 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1700 (Core i9-13900F) and SP5 (EPYC 9115).

FeatureCore i9-13900FEPYC 9115
Socket
LGA1700
SP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600
4800+95900%
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB+3276700%
6144
RAM Channels
2
12+500%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
128+540%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13900F) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 9115). Direct competitor: EPYC 9115 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468X.

FeatureCore i9-13900FEPYC 9115
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i9-13900F launched at $524 MSRP, while the EPYC 9115 debuted at $726. At current prices ($536 vs $726), the Core i9-13900F is $190 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900F delivers 91.3 pts/$ vs 66.6 pts/$ for the EPYC 9115 — making the Core i9-13900F the 31.3% better value option.

FeatureCore i9-13900FEPYC 9115
MSRP
$524-28%
$726
Avg Price (30d)
$536-26%
$726
Performance per Dollar
91.3+37%
66.6
Release Date
2023
2024