EPYC 7453 vs EPYC 9115

EPYC 7453 vs EPYC 9115 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7453

28 / 56

48,453

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

EPYC 9115

16 / 32

48,343

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7453 vs EPYC 9115 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7453 vs EPYC 9115: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7453

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9115 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.9 vs 66.6 PassMark/$ ($1,570 MSRP vs $726 MSRP).
❌80% higher power demand at 225W vs 125W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 9115 moves to SP5 and DDR5.

EPYC 9115

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $844 less on MSRP ($726 MSRP vs $1,570 MSRP).
✅Delivers 115.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 66.6 vs 30.9 PassMark/$ ($726 MSRP vs $1,570 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 225W, a 100W reduction.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (48,343 vs 48,453).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9115 better than EPYC 7453?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 9115 is ahead with a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7453 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7453 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 28 cores and 56 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9115 is the better buy right now. EPYC 9115 comes in $844 cheaper on MSRP at $726 MSRP versus $1,570 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 7453 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.2% better PassMark. It is also 115.8% better value on MSRP (66.6 vs 30.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9115 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2021) and a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of SP3. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7453 vs EPYC 9115 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7453

The EPYC 7453 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.75 GHz, with boost up to 3.45 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,453 points. Launch price was $1,570.

EPYC 9115

The EPYC 9115 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 48,343 points. Launch price was $726.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7453 packs 28 cores / 56 threads, while the EPYC 9115 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7453 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.45 GHz on the EPYC 7453 versus 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9115 — a 17.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 9115 (base: 2.75 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The EPYC 7453 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the EPYC 9115 uses Turin (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7453 scores 48,453 against the EPYC 9115's 48,343 — a 0.2% lead for the EPYC 7453. Both processors carry 64 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	EPYC 7453	EPYC 9115
Cores / Threads	28 / 56+75%	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3.45 GHz	4.1 GHz+19%
Base Clock	2.75 GHz+6%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)	64 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm+	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Turin (2024)
PassMark	48,453	48,343

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7453 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9115 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7453 versus 4800 on the EPYC 9115 — the EPYC 9115 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9115 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7453) vs 12 (EPYC 9115). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3,C621A (EPYC 7453) and SP5 (EPYC 9115).

Feature	EPYC 7453	EPYC 9115
Socket	SP3	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200	4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4096	6144+50%
RAM Channels	8	12+50%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7453) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 9115). Direct competitor: EPYC 7453 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362; EPYC 9115 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468X.

Feature	EPYC 7453	EPYC 9115
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7453 was priced at $1570, while the EPYC 9115 came in at $726. On launch pricing ($1570 vs $726), EPYC 9115 was $844 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7453 delivers 30.9 pts/$ vs 66.6 pts/$ for the EPYC 9115 — making the EPYC 9115 the 73.3% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7453	EPYC 9115
MSRP	$1570	$726-54%
Performance per Dollar	30.9	66.6+116%
Release Date	2021	2024

Search EPYC 7453 on Amazon

Search EPYC 9115 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.