Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

EPYC 7453 vs EPYC Embedded 8224P

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

EPYC 7453

28 Cores56 Thrd225 WWMax: 3.45 GHz2021
EPYC family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

EPYC Embedded 8224P

24 Cores48 Thrd160 WWMax: 3 GHz2023
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7453 vs EPYC Embedded 8224P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7453
28 / 56
48,453
0.0%
brand logoRyzen 5 7600
brand logoRyzen AI Max 385
brand logoRyzen 7 9700X
brand logoRyzen 7 8840HX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3970X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9960X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
EPYC Embedded 8224P
24 / 48
48,869
+0.9%
brand logoRyzen 9 PRO 7940HS
brand logoRyzen 7 8745HX
brand logoRyzen 7 9700X
brand logoRyzen AI Max PRO 390
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3970X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9960X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7453 vs EPYC Embedded 8224P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
EPYC 7453
low164 FPS
medium135 FPS
high114 FPS
ultra90 FPS
1080P
EPYC Embedded 8224P
low157 FPS
medium129 FPS
high108 FPS
ultra86 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
EPYC 7453
low395 FPS
medium350 FPS
high287 FPS
ultra229 FPS
1080P
EPYC Embedded 8224P
low392 FPS
medium348 FPS
high284 FPS
ultra227 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
EPYC 7453
low649 FPS
medium530 FPS
high471 FPS
ultra413 FPS
1080P
EPYC Embedded 8224P
low858 FPS
medium771 FPS
high745 FPS
ultra668 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
EPYC 7453
low886 FPS
medium807 FPS
high696 FPS
ultra611 FPS
1080P
EPYC Embedded 8224P
low1018 FPS
medium908 FPS
high770 FPS
ultra647 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
EPYC 7453
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
EPYC Embedded 8224P
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
EPYC 7453
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra288 FPS
1080P
EPYC Embedded 8224P
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
EPYC 7453
low299 FPS
medium228 FPS
high205 FPS
ultra185 FPS
1080P
EPYC Embedded 8224P
low319 FPS
medium244 FPS
high210 FPS
ultra186 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
EPYC 7453
low246 FPS
medium219 FPS
high170 FPS
ultra136 FPS
1080P
EPYC Embedded 8224P
low252 FPS
medium221 FPS
high171 FPS
ultra136 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
EPYC 7453
low303 FPS
medium263 FPS
high242 FPS
ultra195 FPS
1080P
EPYC Embedded 8224P
low309 FPS
medium272 FPS
high250 FPS
ultra200 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
EPYC 7453
low234 FPS
medium206 FPS
high173 FPS
ultra161 FPS
1080P
EPYC Embedded 8224P
low244 FPS
medium214 FPS
high181 FPS
ultra166 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

EPYC 7453 vs EPYC Embedded 8224P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7453

2021

Why buy it

  • ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC Embedded 8224P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower PassMark (48,453 vs 48,869).
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.9 vs 57.2 PassMark/$ ($1,570 MSRP vs $855 MSRP).
  • ❌40.6% higher power demand at 225W vs 160W.
  • ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC Embedded 8224P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

EPYC Embedded 8224P

2023

Why buy it

  • ✅Better for gaming: +7.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ✅Costs $715 less on MSRP ($855 MSRP vs $1,570 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 85.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 57.2 vs 30.9 PassMark/$ ($855 MSRP vs $1,570 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 160W instead of 225W, a 65W reduction.
  • ✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC Embedded 8224P better than EPYC 7453?
Yes. EPYC Embedded 8224P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, EPYC Embedded 8224P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC Embedded 8224P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC Embedded 8224P is the better buy right now. EPYC Embedded 8224P comes in $715 cheaper on MSRP at $855 MSRP versus $1,570 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 85.2% better value on MSRP (57.2 vs 30.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC Embedded 8224P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 28/56. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7453 vs EPYC Embedded 8224P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 7453

The EPYC 7453 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.75 GHz, with boost up to 3.45 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,453 points. Launch price was $1,570.

AMD

EPYC Embedded 8224P

The EPYC Embedded 8224P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 48,869 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7453 packs 28 cores / 56 threads, while the EPYC Embedded 8224P offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7453 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.45 GHz on the EPYC 7453 versus 3 GHz on the EPYC Embedded 8224P — a 14% clock advantage for the EPYC 7453 (base: 2.75 GHz vs 2.55 GHz). The EPYC 7453 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the EPYC Embedded 8224P uses Siena (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7453 scores 48,453 against the EPYC Embedded 8224P's 48,869 — a 0.9% lead for the EPYC Embedded 8224P. Both processors carry 64 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureEPYC 7453EPYC Embedded 8224P
Cores / Threads
28 / 56+17%
24 / 48
Boost Clock
3.45 GHz+15%
3 GHz
Base Clock
2.75 GHz+8%
2.55 GHz
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)
64 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
1 MB (per core)+100%
Process
7 nm+
5 nm-29%
Architecture
Milan (2021−2023)
Siena (2023−2024)
PassMark
48,453
48,869
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7453 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC Embedded 8224P uses SP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7453 versus 4800 on the EPYC Embedded 8224P — the EPYC Embedded 8224P supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7453 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 1152 — 255.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7453) vs 6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7453) vs 96 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) — the EPYC 7453 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,C621A (EPYC 7453) and SP6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P).

FeatureEPYC 7453EPYC Embedded 8224P
Socket
SP3
SP6
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
3200
4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity
4096+256%
1152
RAM Channels
8+33%
6
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128+33%
96
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7453) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC Embedded 8224P). Direct competitor: EPYC 7453 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362; EPYC Embedded 8224P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y.

FeatureEPYC 7453EPYC Embedded 8224P
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7453 was priced at $1570, while the EPYC Embedded 8224P came in at $855. On launch pricing ($1570 vs $855), EPYC Embedded 8224P was $715 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7453 delivers 30.9 pts/$ vs 57.2 pts/$ for the EPYC Embedded 8224P — making the EPYC Embedded 8224P the 59.7% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 7453EPYC Embedded 8224P
MSRP
$1570
$855-46%
Performance per Dollar
30.9
57.2+85%
Release Date
2021
2023
Search EPYC 7453 on AmazonSearch EPYC Embedded 8224P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.