EPYC 7453 vs Xeon 6517P

EPYC 7453 vs Xeon 6517P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7453

28 / 56

48,453

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon 6517P

16 / 32

48,810

+0.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7453 vs Xeon 6517P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7453 vs Xeon 6517P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7453

2021

Why buy it

✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6517P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (48,453 vs 48,810).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.9 vs 40.8 PassMark/$ ($1,570 MSRP vs $1,195 MSRP).
❌18.4% higher power demand at 225W vs 190W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon 6517P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.

Xeon 6517P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $375 less on MSRP ($1,195 MSRP vs $1,570 MSRP).
✅Delivers 32.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 40.8 vs 30.9 PassMark/$ ($1,195 MSRP vs $1,570 MSRP).
✅Draws 190W instead of 225W, a 35W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6517P better than EPYC 7453?

Yes. Xeon 6517P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 17.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon 6517P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 17.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6517P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6517P is the better buy right now. Xeon 6517P comes in $375 cheaper on MSRP at $1,195 MSRP versus $1,570 MSRP, and it still gives you a 17.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 32.3% better value on MSRP (40.8 vs 30.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6517P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA4710 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 28/56. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7453 vs Xeon 6517P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7453

The EPYC 7453 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.75 GHz, with boost up to 3.45 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,453 points. Launch price was $1,570.

Xeon 6517P

The Xeon 6517P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 72 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 190 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 48,810 points. Launch price was $1,195.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7453 packs 28 cores / 56 threads, while the Xeon 6517P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7453 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.45 GHz on the EPYC 7453 versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon 6517P — a 19.6% clock advantage for the Xeon 6517P (base: 2.75 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The EPYC 7453 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon 6517P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7453 scores 48,453 against the Xeon 6517P's 48,810 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon 6517P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7453 vs 72 MB (total) on the Xeon 6517P.

Feature	EPYC 7453	Xeon 6517P
Cores / Threads	28 / 56+75%	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3.45 GHz	4.2 GHz+22%
Base Clock	2.75 GHz	3.2 GHz+16%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)	72 MB (total)+13%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm+	Intel 3 nm-57%
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	48,453	48,810

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7453 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6517P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7453 versus 6400 on the Xeon 6517P — the Xeon 6517P supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7453) vs 88 (Xeon 6517P) — the EPYC 7453 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,C621A (EPYC 7453) and Granite Rapids-SP (Xeon 6517P).

Feature	EPYC 7453	Xeon 6517P
Socket	SP3	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200	6400+100%
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+45%	88

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7453 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362; Xeon 6517P rivals EPYC 9554.

Feature	EPYC 7453	Xeon 6517P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7453 was priced at $1570, while the Xeon 6517P came in at $1195. On launch pricing ($1570 vs $1195), Xeon 6517P was $375 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7453 delivers 30.9 pts/$ vs 40.8 pts/$ for the Xeon 6517P — making the Xeon 6517P the 27.8% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7453	Xeon 6517P
MSRP	$1570	$1195-24%
Performance per Dollar	30.9	40.8+32%
Release Date	2021	2025

Search EPYC 7453 on Amazon

Search Xeon 6517P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.