
EPYC 7453

Xeon E7-4880 v2
EPYC 7453 vs Xeon E7-4880 v2 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7453 vs Xeon E7-4880 v2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7453 vs Xeon E7-4880 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7453
2021Why buy it
- ✅+70.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 38 MB).
- ✅Costs $5,049 less on MSRP ($1,570 MSRP vs $6,619 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 321.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.9 vs 7.3 PassMark/$ ($1,570 MSRP vs $6,619 MSRP).
- ✅220% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 40) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌73.1% higher power demand at 225W vs 130W.
Xeon E7-4880 v2
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 225W, a 95W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (48,435 vs 48,453).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (38 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.3 vs 30.9 PassMark/$ ($6,619 MSRP vs $1,570 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 7453 better than Xeon E7-4880 v2?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7453 vs Xeon E7-4880 v2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7453
The EPYC 7453 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.75 GHz, with boost up to 3.45 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,453 points. Launch price was $1,570.

Xeon E7-4880 v2
The Xeon E7-4880 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 15 cores and 30 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 48,435 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7453 packs 28 cores / 56 threads, while the Xeon E7-4880 v2 offers 15 cores / 30 threads — the EPYC 7453 has 13 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.45 GHz on the EPYC 7453 versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon E7-4880 v2 — a 10.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 7453 (base: 2.75 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 7453 is built on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 7453 scores 48,453 against the Xeon E7-4880 v2's 48,435 — a 0% lead for the EPYC 7453. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7453 vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon E7-4880 v2.
| Feature | EPYC 7453 | Xeon E7-4880 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 28 / 56+87% | 15 / 30 |
| Boost Clock | 3.45 GHz+11% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.75 GHz+10% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+71% | 37.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | — |
| Process | 7 nm+-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | — |
| PassMark | 48,453 | 48,435 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7453 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E7-4880 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7453 versus 1600 on the Xeon E7-4880 v2 — the EPYC 7453 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7453 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 1536 — 166.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7453) vs 4 (Xeon E7-4880 v2). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7453) vs 40 (Xeon E7-4880 v2) — the EPYC 7453 offers 88 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,C621A (EPYC 7453) and C602-J (Xeon E7-4880 v2).
| Feature | EPYC 7453 | Xeon E7-4880 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200+100% | 1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096+167% | 1536 |
| RAM Channels | 8+100% | 4 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+220% | 40 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 7453 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7453 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362; Xeon E7-4880 v2 rivals AMD Opteron 6380.
| Feature | EPYC 7453 | Xeon E7-4880 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7453 was priced at $1570, while the Xeon E7-4880 v2 came in at $6619. On launch pricing ($1570 vs $6619), EPYC 7453 was $5049 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7453 delivers 30.9 pts/$ vs 7.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E7-4880 v2 — making the EPYC 7453 the 123.3% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7453 | Xeon E7-4880 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1570-76% | $6619 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.9+323% | 7.3 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2014 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















