EPYC 7453 vs Xeon E7-4880 v2

AMD

EPYC 7453

28 Cores56 Thrd225 WWMax: 3.45 GHz2021
EPYC family
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E7-4880 v2

15 Cores30 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······

EPYC 7453 vs Xeon E7-4880 v2 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7453 vs Xeon E7-4880 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7453 vs Xeon E7-4880 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7453

2021

Why buy it

  • +70.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 38 MB).
  • Costs $5,049 less on MSRP ($1,570 MSRP vs $6,619 MSRP).
  • Delivers 321.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.9 vs 7.3 PassMark/$ ($1,570 MSRP vs $6,619 MSRP).
  • 220% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 40) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • 73.1% higher power demand at 225W vs 130W.

Xeon E7-4880 v2

2014

Why buy it

  • Draws 130W instead of 225W, a 95W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (48,435 vs 48,453).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (38 MB vs 64 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.3 vs 30.9 PassMark/$ ($6,619 MSRP vs $1,570 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7453 better than Xeon E7-4880 v2?
Yes. EPYC 7453 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, EPYC 7453 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7453 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 28 cores and 56 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 70.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 38 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 7453 is the better buy right now. EPYC 7453 comes in $5,049 cheaper on MSRP at $1,570 MSRP versus $6,619 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 321.7% better value on MSRP (30.9 vs 7.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7453 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2014), 70.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 38 MB), more multi-core headroom with 28 cores / 56 threads instead of 15/30, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 7453 vs Xeon E7-4880 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 7453

The EPYC 7453 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.75 GHz, with boost up to 3.45 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,453 points. Launch price was $1,570.

Intel

Xeon E7-4880 v2

The Xeon E7-4880 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 15 cores and 30 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 48,435 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7453 packs 28 cores / 56 threads, while the Xeon E7-4880 v2 offers 15 cores / 30 threads — the EPYC 7453 has 13 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.45 GHz on the EPYC 7453 versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon E7-4880 v2 — a 10.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 7453 (base: 2.75 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 7453 is built on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 7453 scores 48,453 against the Xeon E7-4880 v2's 48,435 — a 0% lead for the EPYC 7453. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7453 vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon E7-4880 v2.

FeatureEPYC 7453Xeon E7-4880 v2
Cores / Threads
28 / 56+87%
15 / 30
Boost Clock
3.45 GHz+11%
3.1 GHz
Base Clock
2.75 GHz+10%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)+71%
37.5 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
Process
7 nm+-68%
22 nm
Architecture
Milan (2021−2023)
PassMark
48,453
48,435
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7453 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E7-4880 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7453 versus 1600 on the Xeon E7-4880 v2 — the EPYC 7453 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7453 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 1536 166.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7453) vs 4 (Xeon E7-4880 v2). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7453) vs 40 (Xeon E7-4880 v2) — the EPYC 7453 offers 88 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,C621A (EPYC 7453) and C602-J (Xeon E7-4880 v2).

FeatureEPYC 7453Xeon E7-4880 v2
Socket
SP3
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
3200+100%
1600
Max RAM Capacity
4096+167%
1536
RAM Channels
8+100%
4
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128+220%
40
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 7453 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7453 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362; Xeon E7-4880 v2 rivals AMD Opteron 6380.

FeatureEPYC 7453Xeon E7-4880 v2
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7453 was priced at $1570, while the Xeon E7-4880 v2 came in at $6619. On launch pricing ($1570 vs $6619), EPYC 7453 was $5049 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7453 delivers 30.9 pts/$ vs 7.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E7-4880 v2 — making the EPYC 7453 the 123.3% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 7453Xeon E7-4880 v2
MSRP
$1570-76%
$6619
Performance per Dollar
30.9+323%
7.3
Release Date
2021
2014

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.