EPYC 9115 vs EPYC Embedded 8224P

EPYC 9115 vs EPYC Embedded 8224P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9115

16 / 32

48,343

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

EPYC Embedded 8224P

24 / 48

48,869

+1.1%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9115 vs EPYC Embedded 8224P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9115 vs EPYC Embedded 8224P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9115

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $129 less on MSRP ($726 MSRP vs $855 MSRP).
✅Delivers 16.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 66.6 vs 57.2 PassMark/$ ($726 MSRP vs $855 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 160W, a 35W reduction.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC Embedded 8224P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (48,343 vs 48,869).

EPYC Embedded 8224P

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 57.2 vs 66.6 PassMark/$ ($855 MSRP vs $726 MSRP).
❌28% higher power demand at 160W vs 125W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC Embedded 8224P better than EPYC 9115?

Yes. EPYC Embedded 8224P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC Embedded 8224P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC Embedded 8224P is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC Embedded 8224P is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 9115 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC Embedded 8224P comes in 17.8% more expensive on MSRP at $855 MSRP versus $726 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 9115 is also 16.5% better value on MSRP (66.6 vs 57.2 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9115 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9115 vs EPYC Embedded 8224P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9115

The EPYC 9115 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 48,343 points. Launch price was $726.

EPYC Embedded 8224P

The EPYC Embedded 8224P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 48,869 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9115 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC Embedded 8224P offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC Embedded 8224P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9115 versus 3 GHz on the EPYC Embedded 8224P — a 31% clock advantage for the EPYC 9115 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.55 GHz). The EPYC 9115 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC Embedded 8224P uses Siena (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9115 scores 48,343 against the EPYC Embedded 8224P's 48,869 — a 1.1% lead for the EPYC Embedded 8224P. Both processors carry 64 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	EPYC 9115	EPYC Embedded 8224P
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	24 / 48+50%
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+37%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz+2%	2.55 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)	64 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm-20%	5 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Siena (2023−2024)
PassMark	48,343	48,869+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9115 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC Embedded 8224P uses SP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9115 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 1152 — 433.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9115) vs 6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9115) vs 96 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) — the EPYC 9115 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9115) and SP6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P).

Feature	EPYC 9115	EPYC Embedded 8224P
Socket	SP5	SP6
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	4800	4800
Max RAM Capacity	6144+433%	1152
RAM Channels	12+100%	6
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+33%	96

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 9115 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468X; EPYC Embedded 8224P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y.

Feature	EPYC 9115	EPYC Embedded 8224P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9115 was priced at $726, while the EPYC Embedded 8224P came in at $855. On launch pricing ($726 vs $855), EPYC 9115 was $129 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9115 delivers 66.6 pts/$ vs 57.2 pts/$ for the EPYC Embedded 8224P — making the EPYC 9115 the 15.2% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9115	EPYC Embedded 8224P
MSRP	$726-15%	$855
Performance per Dollar	66.6+16%	57.2
Release Date	2024	2023

Search EPYC 9115 on Amazon

Search EPYC Embedded 8224P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.