EPYC 9224 vs Xeon w7-3445

EPYC 9224 vs Xeon w7-3445 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9224

24 / 48

48,573

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon w7-3445

20 / 40

48,991

+0.9%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9224 vs Xeon w7-3445 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9224 vs Xeon w7-3445: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9224

2022

Why buy it

✅+21.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 53 MB).
✅Costs $164 less on MSRP ($1,825 MSRP vs $1,989 MSRP).
✅Delivers 8.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 26.6 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($1,825 MSRP vs $1,989 MSRP).
✅Draws 200W instead of 270W, a 70W reduction.
✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-3445 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (48,573 vs 48,991).

Xeon w7-3445

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (53 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.6 vs 26.6 PassMark/$ ($1,989 MSRP vs $1,825 MSRP).
❌35% higher power demand at 270W vs 200W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w7-3445 better than EPYC 9224?

Yes. Xeon w7-3445 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 13.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon w7-3445 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 13.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w7-3445 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 20 cores and 40 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w7-3445 is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 9224 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon w7-3445 comes in 9.0% more expensive on MSRP at $1,989 MSRP versus $1,825 MSRP, and it still gives you a 13.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 9224 is also 8.1% better value on MSRP (26.6 vs 24.6 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w7-3445 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 20 cores / 40 threads instead of 24/48. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 9224 vs Xeon w7-3445 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9224

The EPYC 9224 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 48,573 points. Launch price was $1,825.

Xeon w7-3445

The Xeon w7-3445 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 52.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 48,991 points. Launch price was $1,989.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9224 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon w7-3445 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the EPYC 9224 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9224 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3445 — a 25.9% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-3445 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The EPYC 9224 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon w7-3445 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9224 scores 48,573 against the Xeon w7-3445's 48,991 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon w7-3445. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9224 vs 52.5 MB on the Xeon w7-3445.

Feature	EPYC 9224	Xeon w7-3445
Cores / Threads	24 / 48+20%	20 / 40
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	4.8 GHz+30%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.6 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+22%	52.5 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm, 6 nm-29%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	48,573	48,991

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9224 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w7-3445 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9224 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9224) vs 8 (Xeon w7-3445). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9224) vs 112 (Xeon w7-3445) — the EPYC 9224 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9224) and W790 (Xeon w7-3445).

Feature	EPYC 9224	Xeon w7-3445
Socket	SP5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	4800	4800
Max RAM Capacity	6144+50%	4096
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+14%	112

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w7-3445 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 9224) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon w7-3445). Direct competitor: EPYC 9224 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468X; Xeon w7-3445 rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.

Feature	EPYC 9224	Xeon w7-3445
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9224 was priced at $1825, while the Xeon w7-3445 came in at $1989. On launch pricing ($1825 vs $1989), EPYC 9224 was $164 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9224 delivers 26.6 pts/$ vs 24.6 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-3445 — making the EPYC 9224 the 7.7% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9224	Xeon w7-3445
MSRP	$1825-8%	$1989
Performance per Dollar	26.6+8%	24.6
Release Date	2022	2023

Search EPYC 9224 on Amazon

Search Xeon w7-3445 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.