EPYC 9224 vs Xeon 6517P

EPYC 9224 vs Xeon 6517P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9224

24 / 48

48,573

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon 6517P

16 / 32

48,810

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9224 vs Xeon 6517P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9224 vs Xeon 6517P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9224

2022

Why buy it

✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6517P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (48,573 vs 48,810).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 26.6 vs 40.8 PassMark/$ ($1,825 MSRP vs $1,195 MSRP).

Xeon 6517P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $630 less on MSRP ($1,195 MSRP vs $1,825 MSRP).
✅Delivers 53.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 40.8 vs 26.6 PassMark/$ ($1,195 MSRP vs $1,825 MSRP).
✅Draws 190W instead of 200W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6517P better than EPYC 9224?

Yes. Xeon 6517P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon 6517P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6517P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6517P is the better buy right now. Xeon 6517P comes in $630 cheaper on MSRP at $1,195 MSRP versus $1,825 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 53.5% better value on MSRP (40.8 vs 26.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6517P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 24/48. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9224 vs Xeon 6517P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9224

The EPYC 9224 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 48,573 points. Launch price was $1,825.

Xeon 6517P

The Xeon 6517P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 72 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 190 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 48,810 points. Launch price was $1,195.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9224 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon 6517P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 9224 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9224 versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon 6517P — a 12.7% clock advantage for the Xeon 6517P (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The EPYC 9224 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon 6517P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9224 scores 48,573 against the Xeon 6517P's 48,810 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon 6517P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9224 vs 72 MB (total) on the Xeon 6517P.

Feature	EPYC 9224	Xeon 6517P
Cores / Threads	24 / 48+50%	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	4.2 GHz+14%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.2 GHz+28%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)	72 MB (total)+13%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm, 6 nm	Intel 3 nm-40%
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	48,573	48,810

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9224 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6517P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9224 versus 6400 on the Xeon 6517P — the Xeon 6517P supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9224 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9224) vs 8 (Xeon 6517P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9224) vs 88 (Xeon 6517P) — the EPYC 9224 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9224) and Granite Rapids-SP (Xeon 6517P).

Feature	EPYC 9224	Xeon 6517P
Socket	SP5	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	4800	6400+33%
Max RAM Capacity	6144+50%	4096
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+45%	88

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 9224) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6517P). Direct competitor: EPYC 9224 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468X; Xeon 6517P rivals EPYC 9554.

Feature	EPYC 9224	Xeon 6517P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9224 was priced at $1825, while the Xeon 6517P came in at $1195. On launch pricing ($1825 vs $1195), Xeon 6517P was $630 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9224 delivers 26.6 pts/$ vs 40.8 pts/$ for the Xeon 6517P — making the Xeon 6517P the 42.2% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9224	Xeon 6517P
MSRP	$1825	$1195-35%
Performance per Dollar	26.6	40.8+53%
Release Date	2022	2025

Search EPYC 9224 on Amazon

Search Xeon 6517P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.