Core Ultra 7 265F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
Core Ultra 7 265F
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265F
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 265F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($276) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($999) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Chagall PRO (2022) / 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 265F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+265%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($276) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($999) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 265F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
Core Ultra 7 265F
The Core Ultra 7 265F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 49,161 points. Launch price was $379.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 March 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,756 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 265F packs 20 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Core Ultra 7 265F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265F versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX — a 16.3% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265F (base: 2.4 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 265F uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 265F scores 49,161 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX's 48,756 — a 0.8% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265F. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 265F vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 20+25% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+18% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 4 GHz+67% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 64 MB+113% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+500% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Chagall PRO (2022) |
| PassMark | 49,161 | 48,756 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 25,459 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 20,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 265F uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 265F versus 3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 256 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 7 265F) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX). PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 7 265F) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z890,B860,H810 (Core Ultra 7 265F) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX).
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | 3200+63900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+13107100% | 2048 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 128+433% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 265F) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX). Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 265F targets High Performance Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX rivals Xeon w5-3335.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
| Target Use | High Performance Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Core Ultra 7 265F launched at $369 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX debuted at $799. At current prices ($276 vs $999), the Core Ultra 7 265F is $723 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 7 265F delivers 178.1 pts/$ vs 48.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX — making the Core Ultra 7 265F the 114% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $369-54% | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $276-72% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 178.1+265% | 48.8 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 7 265F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
