Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

EPYC Embedded 8224P

24 Cores48 Thrd160 WWMax: 3 GHz2023
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

16 Cores32 Thrd280 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2022
Threadripper Pro family
···
Buy on Amazon

EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX Performance Spectrum

EPYC Embedded 8224P
24 / 48
48,869
+0.2%
brand logoRyzen 9 PRO 7940HS
brand logoRyzen 7 8745HX
brand logoRyzen 7 9700X
brand logoRyzen AI Max PRO 390
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3970X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9960X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
16 / 32
48,756
0.0%
brand logoRyzen 5 7600
brand logoRyzen 7 8745HX
brand logoRyzen 7 9700X
brand logoRyzen AI Max PRO 390
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3970X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9960X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
EPYC Embedded 8224P
low157 FPS
medium129 FPS
high108 FPS
ultra86 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
low216 FPS
medium175 FPS
high148 FPS
ultra108 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
EPYC Embedded 8224P
low392 FPS
medium348 FPS
high284 FPS
ultra227 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
low770 FPS
medium656 FPS
high516 FPS
ultra453 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
EPYC Embedded 8224P
low858 FPS
medium771 FPS
high745 FPS
ultra668 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
low806 FPS
medium662 FPS
high605 FPS
ultra526 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
EPYC Embedded 8224P
low1018 FPS
medium908 FPS
high770 FPS
ultra647 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
low1200 FPS
medium1015 FPS
high911 FPS
ultra806 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
EPYC Embedded 8224P
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
EPYC Embedded 8224P
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
EPYC Embedded 8224P
low319 FPS
medium244 FPS
high210 FPS
ultra186 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
low321 FPS
medium248 FPS
high226 FPS
ultra203 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
EPYC Embedded 8224P
low252 FPS
medium221 FPS
high171 FPS
ultra136 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
low325 FPS
medium289 FPS
high228 FPS
ultra192 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
EPYC Embedded 8224P
low309 FPS
medium272 FPS
high250 FPS
ultra200 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
low355 FPS
medium304 FPS
high263 FPS
ultra223 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
EPYC Embedded 8224P
low244 FPS
medium214 FPS
high181 FPS
ultra166 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
low283 FPS
medium262 FPS
high221 FPS
ultra207 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC Embedded 8224P

2023

Why buy it

  • ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
  • ✅Draws 160W instead of 280W, a 120W reduction.
  • ✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌
    7% HIGHER MSRP
    $855 MSRPvs$799 MSRP

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

2022

Why buy it

  • ✅Better for gaming: +37.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ✅Costs $56 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $855 MSRP).
  • ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (48,756 vs 48,869).
  • ❌75% higher power demand at 280W vs 160W.
  • ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while EPYC Embedded 8224P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC Embedded 8224P better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is ahead with a 37.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC Embedded 8224P pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC Embedded 8224P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC Embedded 8224P is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC Embedded 8224P comes in 7.0% more expensive on MSRP at $855 MSRP versus $799 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 37.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is also 6.8% better value on MSRP (61.0 vs 57.2 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC Embedded 8224P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of sWRX8, and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 16/32. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC Embedded 8224P

The EPYC Embedded 8224P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 48,869 points. Launch price was $800.

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 March 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,756 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC Embedded 8224P packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC Embedded 8224P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC Embedded 8224P versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX — a 40% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX (base: 2.55 GHz vs 4 GHz). The EPYC Embedded 8224P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC Embedded 8224P scores 48,869 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX's 48,756 — a 0.2% lead for the EPYC Embedded 8224P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC Embedded 8224P vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX.

FeatureEPYC Embedded 8224PRyzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
Cores / Threads
24 / 48+50%
16 / 32
Boost Clock
3 GHz
4.5 GHz+50%
Base Clock
2.55 GHz
4 GHz+57%
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)
64 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
512K (per core)+51100%
Process
5 nm-29%
7 nm
Architecture
Siena (2023−2024)
Chagall PRO (2022)
PassMark
48,869
48,756
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC Embedded 8224P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC Embedded 8224P versus 3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX — the EPYC Embedded 8224P supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 1152 — 77.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX).

FeatureEPYC Embedded 8224PRyzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
Socket
SP6
sWRX8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
4800+50%
3200
Max RAM Capacity
1152
2048+78%
RAM Channels
6
8+33%
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
96
128+33%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC Embedded 8224P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX rivals Xeon w5-3335.

FeatureEPYC Embedded 8224PRyzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC Embedded 8224P was priced at $855, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX came in at $799. On launch pricing ($855 vs $799), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX was $56 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC Embedded 8224P delivers 57.2 pts/$ vs 61.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX the 6.5% better value option.

FeatureEPYC Embedded 8224PRyzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
MSRP
$855
$799-7%
Performance per Dollar
57.2
61.0+7%
Release Date
2023
2022
Search EPYC Embedded 8224P on AmazonSearch Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.