EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Xeon w7-3445

EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Xeon w7-3445 Performance Spectrum

EPYC Embedded 8224P

24 / 48

48,869

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon w7-3445

20 / 40

48,991

+0.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Xeon w7-3445 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Xeon w7-3445: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC Embedded 8224P

2023

Why buy it

✅+21.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 53 MB).
✅Costs $1,134 less on MSRP ($855 MSRP vs $1,989 MSRP).
✅Delivers 132.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 57.2 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($855 MSRP vs $1,989 MSRP).
✅Draws 160W instead of 270W, a 110W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-3445 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (48,869 vs 48,991).

Xeon w7-3445

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (53 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.6 vs 57.2 PassMark/$ ($1,989 MSRP vs $855 MSRP).
❌68.8% higher power demand at 270W vs 160W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w7-3445 better than EPYC Embedded 8224P?

Yes. Xeon w7-3445 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 16.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon w7-3445 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 16.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w7-3445 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 20 cores and 40 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w7-3445 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Xeon w7-3445 comes in 132.6% more expensive on MSRP at $1,989 MSRP versus $855 MSRP, and it still gives you a 16.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC Embedded 8224P only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 16.7% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w7-3445 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Xeon w7-3445 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC Embedded 8224P

The EPYC Embedded 8224P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 48,869 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon w7-3445

The Xeon w7-3445 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 52.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 48,991 points. Launch price was $1,989.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC Embedded 8224P packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon w7-3445 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the EPYC Embedded 8224P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC Embedded 8224P versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3445 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-3445 (base: 2.55 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The EPYC Embedded 8224P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon w7-3445 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC Embedded 8224P scores 48,869 against the Xeon w7-3445's 48,991 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon w7-3445. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC Embedded 8224P vs 52.5 MB on the Xeon w7-3445.

Feature	EPYC Embedded 8224P	Xeon w7-3445
Cores / Threads	24 / 48+20%	20 / 40
Boost Clock	3 GHz	4.8 GHz+60%
Base Clock	2.55 GHz	2.6 GHz+2%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+22%	52.5 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm-29%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	48,869	48,991

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC Embedded 8224P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w7-3445 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. The Xeon w7-3445 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 1152 — 255.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) vs 8 (Xeon w7-3445). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) vs 112 (Xeon w7-3445) — the Xeon w7-3445 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) and W790 (Xeon w7-3445).

Feature	EPYC Embedded 8224P	Xeon w7-3445
Socket	SP6	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	4800	4800
Max RAM Capacity	1152	4096+256%
RAM Channels	6	8+33%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	96	112+17%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w7-3445 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC Embedded 8224P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon w7-3445). Direct competitor: EPYC Embedded 8224P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y; Xeon w7-3445 rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.

Feature	EPYC Embedded 8224P	Xeon w7-3445
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC Embedded 8224P was priced at $855, while the Xeon w7-3445 came in at $1989. On launch pricing ($855 vs $1989), EPYC Embedded 8224P was $1134 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC Embedded 8224P delivers 57.2 pts/$ vs 24.6 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-3445 — making the EPYC Embedded 8224P the 79.5% better value option.

Feature	EPYC Embedded 8224P	Xeon w7-3445
MSRP	$855-57%	$1989
Performance per Dollar	57.2+133%	24.6
Release Date	2023	2023

Search EPYC Embedded 8224P on Amazon

Search Xeon w7-3445 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.