
EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Xeon w7-3445

EPYC Embedded 8224P

Xeon w7-3445
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC Embedded 8224P
Performance Per Dollar Xeon w7-3445
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC Embedded 8224P | Xeon w7-3445 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($1,048) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,596) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Siena (2023−2024) / 5 nm) | ✨ Modern (Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC Embedded 8224P | Xeon w7-3445 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+147%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($1,048) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,596) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC Embedded 8224P and Xeon w7-3445

EPYC Embedded 8224P
The EPYC Embedded 8224P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 48,869 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon w7-3445
The Xeon w7-3445 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 52.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 48,991 points. Launch price was $1,989.
Processing Power
The EPYC Embedded 8224P packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon w7-3445 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the EPYC Embedded 8224P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC Embedded 8224P versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3445 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-3445 (base: 2.55 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The EPYC Embedded 8224P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon w7-3445 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC Embedded 8224P scores 48,869 against the Xeon w7-3445's 48,991 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon w7-3445. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC Embedded 8224P vs 52.5 MB on the Xeon w7-3445.
| Feature | EPYC Embedded 8224P | Xeon w7-3445 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+20% | 20 / 40 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 4.8 GHz+60% |
| Base Clock | 2.55 GHz | 2.6 GHz+2% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+22% | 52.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Siena (2023−2024) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 48,869 | 48,991 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC Embedded 8224P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w7-3445 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. The Xeon w7-3445 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 1152 — 112.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) vs 8 (Xeon w7-3445). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) vs 112 (Xeon w7-3445) — the Xeon w7-3445 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) and W790 (Xeon w7-3445).
| Feature | EPYC Embedded 8224P | Xeon w7-3445 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP6 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1152 | 4096+256% |
| RAM Channels | 6 | 8+33% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 96 | 112+17% |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon w7-3445 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC Embedded 8224P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon w7-3445). Direct competitor: EPYC Embedded 8224P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y; Xeon w7-3445 rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.
| Feature | EPYC Embedded 8224P | Xeon w7-3445 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The EPYC Embedded 8224P launched at $855 MSRP, while the Xeon w7-3445 debuted at $1989. At current prices ($1048 vs $2596), the EPYC Embedded 8224P is $1548 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC Embedded 8224P delivers 46.6 pts/$ vs 18.9 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-3445 — making the EPYC Embedded 8224P the 84.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC Embedded 8224P | Xeon w7-3445 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $855-57% | $1989 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1048-60% | $2596 |
| Performance per Dollar | 46.6+147% | 18.9 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.

















