EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC Embedded 8224P

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $544 less on MSRP ($855 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
✅Delivers 60.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 57.2 vs 35.6 PassMark/$ ($855 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
✅Draws 160W instead of 350W, a 190W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (48,869 vs 49,756).

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +25.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 35.6 vs 57.2 PassMark/$ ($1,399 MSRP vs $855 MSRP).
❌118.8% higher power demand at 350W vs 160W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX better than EPYC Embedded 8224P?

Yes. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 25.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 25.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.8% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX comes in 63.6% more expensive on MSRP at $1,399 MSRP versus $855 MSRP, and it still gives you a 25.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC Embedded 8224P only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 25.2% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC Embedded 8224P

The EPYC Embedded 8224P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 48,869 points. Launch price was $800.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 49,756 points. Launch price was $1,399.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC Embedded 8224P packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC Embedded 8224P has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC Embedded 8224P versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX — a 55.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX (base: 2.55 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The EPYC Embedded 8224P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC Embedded 8224P scores 48,869 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX's 49,756 — a 1.8% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX. Both processors carry 64 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	EPYC Embedded 8224P	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
Cores / Threads	24 / 48+100%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	3 GHz	5.3 GHz+77%
Base Clock	2.55 GHz	4.7 GHz+84%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)	64 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm	5 nm
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	Storm Peak (2023)
PassMark	48,869	49,756+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC Embedded 8224P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC Embedded 8224P versus 5200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX supports 8.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 1152 — 77.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX).

Feature	EPYC Embedded 8224P	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
Socket	SP6	sTR5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	4800	5200+8%
Max RAM Capacity	1152	2048+78%
RAM Channels	6	8+33%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	96	128+33%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC Embedded 8224P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX rivals Xeon w5-3435X.

Feature	EPYC Embedded 8224P	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC Embedded 8224P was priced at $855, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX came in at $1399. On launch pricing ($855 vs $1399), EPYC Embedded 8224P was $544 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC Embedded 8224P delivers 57.2 pts/$ vs 35.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX — making the EPYC Embedded 8224P the 46.6% better value option.

Feature	EPYC Embedded 8224P	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
MSRP	$855-39%	$1399
Performance per Dollar	57.2+61%	35.6
Release Date	2023	2023

Search EPYC Embedded 8224P on Amazon

Search Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.