EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Xeon 6736P

EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Xeon 6736P Performance Spectrum

EPYC Embedded 8224P

24 / 48

48,869

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon 6736P

36 / 72

50,072

+2.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Xeon 6736P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Xeon 6736P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC Embedded 8224P

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,496 less on MSRP ($855 MSRP vs $3,351 MSRP).
✅Delivers 282.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 57.2 vs 14.9 PassMark/$ ($855 MSRP vs $3,351 MSRP).
✅Draws 160W instead of 205W, a 45W reduction.
✅9.1% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (64 MB vs 144 MB).
❌Lower PassMark (48,869 vs 50,072).

Xeon 6736P

2025

Why buy it

✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 144 MB vs 64 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.9 vs 57.2 PassMark/$ ($3,351 MSRP vs $855 MSRP).
❌28.1% higher power demand at 205W vs 160W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6736P better than EPYC Embedded 8224P?

Yes. Xeon 6736P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon 6736P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 144 MB versus 64 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6736P is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.5% better PassMark, backed by 36 cores and 72 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 125% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 64 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6736P is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Xeon 6736P comes in 291.9% more expensive on MSRP at $3,351 MSRP versus $855 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC Embedded 8224P only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 0.7% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6736P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023), 3D V-Cache and a much larger 144 MB L3 cache instead of 64 MB, and more multi-core headroom with 36 cores / 72 threads instead of 24/48. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Xeon 6736P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC Embedded 8224P

The EPYC Embedded 8224P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 48,869 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon 6736P

The Xeon 6736P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 36 cores and 72 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 50,072 points. Launch price was $3,351.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC Embedded 8224P packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon 6736P offers 36 cores / 72 threads — the Xeon 6736P has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC Embedded 8224P versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon 6736P — a 31% clock advantage for the Xeon 6736P (base: 2.55 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC Embedded 8224P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon 6736P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC Embedded 8224P scores 48,869 against the Xeon 6736P's 50,072 — a 2.4% lead for the Xeon 6736P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC Embedded 8224P vs 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6736P.

Feature	EPYC Embedded 8224P	Xeon 6736P
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	36 / 72+50%
Boost Clock	3 GHz	4.1 GHz+37%
Base Clock	2.55 GHz+27%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)	144 MB (total)+125%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm	Intel 3 nm-40%
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	48,869	50,072+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC Embedded 8224P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6736P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC Embedded 8224P versus 6400 on the Xeon 6736P — the Xeon 6736P supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6736P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 1152 — 255.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) vs 8 (Xeon 6736P). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) vs 88 (Xeon 6736P) — the EPYC Embedded 8224P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) and Granite Rapids-SP (Xeon 6736P).

Feature	EPYC Embedded 8224P	Xeon 6736P
Socket	SP6	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	4800	6400+33%
Max RAM Capacity	1152	4096+256%
RAM Channels	6	8+33%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	96+9%	88

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC Embedded 8224P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6736P). Direct competitor: EPYC Embedded 8224P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y; Xeon 6736P rivals EPYC 9684X.

Feature	EPYC Embedded 8224P	Xeon 6736P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC Embedded 8224P was priced at $855, while the Xeon 6736P came in at $3351. On launch pricing ($855 vs $3351), EPYC Embedded 8224P was $2496 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC Embedded 8224P delivers 57.2 pts/$ vs 14.9 pts/$ for the Xeon 6736P — making the EPYC Embedded 8224P the 117.1% better value option.

Feature	EPYC Embedded 8224P	Xeon 6736P
MSRP	$855-74%	$3351
Performance per Dollar	57.2+284%	14.9
Release Date	2023	2025

Search EPYC Embedded 8224P on Amazon

Search Xeon 6736P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.