EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Xeon Gold 6314U
EPYC Embedded 8224P
Xeon Gold 6314U
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC Embedded 8224P
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Gold 6314U
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC Embedded 8224P | Xeon Gold 6314U |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($1,048) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,977) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Siena (2023−2024) / 5 nm) | ✨ Modern (Ice Lake-SP (2021) / 10 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC Embedded 8224P | Xeon Gold 6314U |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+184%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($1,048) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,977) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC Embedded 8224P and Xeon Gold 6314U
EPYC Embedded 8224P
The EPYC Embedded 8224P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 48,869 points. Launch price was $800.
Xeon Gold 6314U
The Xeon Gold 6314U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,916 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The EPYC Embedded 8224P packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6314U offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Gold 6314U has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC Embedded 8224P versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6314U — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6314U (base: 2.55 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The EPYC Embedded 8224P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6314U uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC Embedded 8224P scores 48,869 against the Xeon Gold 6314U's 48,916 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon Gold 6314U. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC Embedded 8224P vs 48 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6314U.
| Feature | EPYC Embedded 8224P | Xeon Gold 6314U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 32 / 64+33% |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 3.4 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 2.55 GHz+11% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+33% | 48 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-50% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Siena (2023−2024) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 48,869 | 48,916 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC Embedded 8224P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6314U uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC Embedded 8224P versus 3200 on the Xeon Gold 6314U — the EPYC Embedded 8224P supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6314U supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 1152 — 112.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6314U). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) vs 128 (Xeon Gold 6314U) — the Xeon Gold 6314U offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) and SP3,C621A (Xeon Gold 6314U).
| Feature | EPYC Embedded 8224P | Xeon Gold 6314U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP6 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+50% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1152 | 4096+256% |
| RAM Channels | 6 | 8+33% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 96 | 128+33% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC Embedded 8224P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6314U). Direct competitor: EPYC Embedded 8224P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y; Xeon Gold 6314U rivals Xeon Platinum 8362.
| Feature | EPYC Embedded 8224P | Xeon Gold 6314U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The EPYC Embedded 8224P launched at $855 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6314U debuted at $2977.
| Feature | EPYC Embedded 8224P | Xeon Gold 6314U |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $855-71% | $2977 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1048 | — |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC Embedded 8224P and Xeon Gold 6314U
