EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

AMD

EPYC Embedded 8224P

24 Cores48 Thrd160 WWMax: 3 GHz2023
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

32 Cores64 Thrd300 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2023
Similar parts
·······

EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC Embedded 8224P

2023

Why buy it

  • Costs $5,090 less on MSRP ($855 MSRP vs $5,945 MSRP).
  • Delivers 577.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 57.2 vs 8.4 PassMark/$ ($855 MSRP vs $5,945 MSRP).
  • Draws 160W instead of 300W, a 140W reduction.
  • 20% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (48,869 vs 50,189).

Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

2023

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 57.2 PassMark/$ ($5,945 MSRP vs $855 MSRP).
    • 87.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 160W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ better than EPYC Embedded 8224P?
    Yes. Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.7% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ comes in 595.3% more expensive on MSRP at $5,945 MSRP versus $855 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC Embedded 8224P only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 2.0% in the shared gaming data.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 24/48. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    EPYC Embedded 8224P

    The EPYC Embedded 8224P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 48,869 points. Launch price was $800.

    Intel

    Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

    The Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 50,189 points. Launch price was $5,945.

    Processing Power

    The EPYC Embedded 8224P packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC Embedded 8224P versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ — a 31% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ (base: 2.55 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The EPYC Embedded 8224P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC Embedded 8224P scores 48,869 against the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+'s 50,189 — a 2.7% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC Embedded 8224P vs 60 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+.

    FeatureEPYC Embedded 8224PXeon Platinum 8562Y+
    Cores / Threads
    24 / 48
    32 / 64+33%
    Boost Clock
    3 GHz
    4.1 GHz+37%
    Base Clock
    2.55 GHz
    2.8 GHz+10%
    L3 Cache
    64 MB (total)+7%
    60 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    1 MB (per core)
    2 MB (per core)+100%
    Process
    5 nm-50%
    10 nm
    Architecture
    Siena (2023−2024)
    Emerald Rapids (2023)
    PassMark
    48,869
    50,189+3%
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The EPYC Embedded 8224P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC Embedded 8224P versus 5600 on the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ — the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 1152 255.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8562Y+). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8562Y+) — the EPYC Embedded 8224P offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8562Y+).

    FeatureEPYC Embedded 8224PXeon Platinum 8562Y+
    Socket
    SP6
    LGA4677
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 4.0
    PCIe 5.0+25%
    Max RAM Speed
    4800
    5600+17%
    Max RAM Capacity
    1152
    4096+256%
    RAM Channels
    6
    8+33%
    ECC Support
    Yes
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    96+20%
    80
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC Embedded 8224P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8562Y+). Direct competitor: EPYC Embedded 8224P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y; Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ rivals EPYC 9474F.

    FeatureEPYC Embedded 8224PXeon Platinum 8562Y+
    Integrated GPU
    No
    No
    IGPU Model
    None
    None
    Unlocked
    No
    No
    AVX-512
    Yes
    Yes
    Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
    VT-x, VT-d
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the EPYC Embedded 8224P was priced at $855, while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ came in at $5945. On launch pricing ($855 vs $5945), EPYC Embedded 8224P was $5090 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC Embedded 8224P delivers 57.2 pts/$ vs 8.4 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ — making the EPYC Embedded 8224P the 148.5% better value option.

    FeatureEPYC Embedded 8224PXeon Platinum 8562Y+
    MSRP
    $855-86%
    $5945
    Performance per Dollar
    57.2+581%
    8.4
    Release Date
    2023
    2023

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.