EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Xeon E7-4880 v2

EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Xeon E7-4880 v2 Performance Spectrum

EPYC Embedded 8224P

24 / 48

48,869

+0.9%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon E7-4880 v2

15 / 30

48,435

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Xeon E7-4880 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Xeon E7-4880 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC Embedded 8224P

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+70.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 38 MB).
✅Costs $5,764 less on MSRP ($855 MSRP vs $6,619 MSRP).
✅Delivers 681.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 57.2 vs 7.3 PassMark/$ ($855 MSRP vs $6,619 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌23.1% higher power demand at 160W vs 130W.

Xeon E7-4880 v2

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 130W instead of 160W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC Embedded 8224P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (48,435 vs 48,869).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (38 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.3 vs 57.2 PassMark/$ ($6,619 MSRP vs $855 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA2011, while EPYC Embedded 8224P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC Embedded 8224P better than Xeon E7-4880 v2?

Yes. EPYC Embedded 8224P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC Embedded 8224P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC Embedded 8224P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 70.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 38 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC Embedded 8224P is the better buy right now. EPYC Embedded 8224P comes in $5,764 cheaper on MSRP at $855 MSRP versus $6,619 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 681.1% better value on MSRP (57.2 vs 7.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC Embedded 8224P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2014), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, 70.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 38 MB), more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 15/30, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Xeon E7-4880 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC Embedded 8224P

The EPYC Embedded 8224P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 48,869 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E7-4880 v2

The Xeon E7-4880 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 15 cores and 30 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 48,435 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC Embedded 8224P packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon E7-4880 v2 offers 15 cores / 30 threads — the EPYC Embedded 8224P has 9 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC Embedded 8224P versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon E7-4880 v2 — a 3.3% clock advantage for the Xeon E7-4880 v2 (base: 2.55 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC Embedded 8224P is built on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC Embedded 8224P scores 48,869 against the Xeon E7-4880 v2's 48,435 — a 0.9% lead for the EPYC Embedded 8224P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC Embedded 8224P vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon E7-4880 v2.

Feature	EPYC Embedded 8224P	Xeon E7-4880 v2
Cores / Threads	24 / 48+60%	15 / 30
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.1 GHz+3%
Base Clock	2.55 GHz+2%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+71%	37.5 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	—
Process	5 nm-77%	22 nm
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	—
PassMark	48,869	48,435

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC Embedded 8224P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E7-4880 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC Embedded 8224P versus 1600 on the Xeon E7-4880 v2 — the EPYC Embedded 8224P supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E7-4880 v2 supports up to 1536 of RAM compared to 1152 — 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) vs 4 (Xeon E7-4880 v2). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) vs 40 (Xeon E7-4880 v2) — the EPYC Embedded 8224P offers 56 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) and C602-J (Xeon E7-4880 v2).

Feature	EPYC Embedded 8224P	Xeon E7-4880 v2
Socket	SP6	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	4800+200%	1600
Max RAM Capacity	1152	1536+33%
RAM Channels	6+50%	4
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	96+140%	40

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC Embedded 8224P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC Embedded 8224P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E7-4880 v2). Direct competitor: EPYC Embedded 8224P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y; Xeon E7-4880 v2 rivals AMD Opteron 6380.

Feature	EPYC Embedded 8224P	Xeon E7-4880 v2
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC Embedded 8224P was priced at $855, while the Xeon E7-4880 v2 came in at $6619. On launch pricing ($855 vs $6619), EPYC Embedded 8224P was $5764 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC Embedded 8224P delivers 57.2 pts/$ vs 7.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E7-4880 v2 — making the EPYC Embedded 8224P the 154.6% better value option.

Feature	EPYC Embedded 8224P	Xeon E7-4880 v2
MSRP	$855-87%	$6619
Performance per Dollar	57.2+684%	7.3
Release Date	2023	2014

Search EPYC Embedded 8224P on Amazon

Search Xeon E7-4880 v2 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.