EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Xeon 6517P

EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Xeon 6517P Performance Spectrum

EPYC Embedded 8224P

24 / 48

48,869

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon 6517P

16 / 32

48,810

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Xeon 6517P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Xeon 6517P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC Embedded 8224P

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $340 less on MSRP ($855 MSRP vs $1,195 MSRP).
✅Delivers 39.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 57.2 vs 40.8 PassMark/$ ($855 MSRP vs $1,195 MSRP).
✅Draws 160W instead of 190W, a 30W reduction.
✅9.1% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6517P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Xeon 6517P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (48,810 vs 48,869).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 40.8 vs 57.2 PassMark/$ ($1,195 MSRP vs $855 MSRP).
❌18.8% higher power demand at 190W vs 160W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC Embedded 8224P better than Xeon 6517P?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon 6517P is ahead with a 9.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC Embedded 8224P pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC Embedded 8224P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC Embedded 8224P is the better buy right now. EPYC Embedded 8224P comes in $340 cheaper on MSRP at $855 MSRP versus $1,195 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon 6517P is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 9.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 39.9% better value on MSRP (57.2 vs 40.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6517P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Xeon 6517P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC Embedded 8224P

The EPYC Embedded 8224P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 48,869 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon 6517P

The Xeon 6517P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 72 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 190 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 48,810 points. Launch price was $1,195.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC Embedded 8224P packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon 6517P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC Embedded 8224P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC Embedded 8224P versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon 6517P — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Xeon 6517P (base: 2.55 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The EPYC Embedded 8224P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon 6517P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC Embedded 8224P scores 48,869 against the Xeon 6517P's 48,810 — a 0.1% lead for the EPYC Embedded 8224P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC Embedded 8224P vs 72 MB (total) on the Xeon 6517P.

Feature	EPYC Embedded 8224P	Xeon 6517P
Cores / Threads	24 / 48+50%	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3 GHz	4.2 GHz+40%
Base Clock	2.55 GHz	3.2 GHz+25%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)	72 MB (total)+13%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm	Intel 3 nm-40%
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	48,869	48,810

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC Embedded 8224P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6517P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC Embedded 8224P versus 6400 on the Xeon 6517P — the Xeon 6517P supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6517P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 1152 — 255.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) vs 8 (Xeon 6517P). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) vs 88 (Xeon 6517P) — the EPYC Embedded 8224P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) and Granite Rapids-SP (Xeon 6517P).

Feature	EPYC Embedded 8224P	Xeon 6517P
Socket	SP6	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	4800	6400+33%
Max RAM Capacity	1152	4096+256%
RAM Channels	6	8+33%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	96+9%	88

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC Embedded 8224P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6517P). Direct competitor: EPYC Embedded 8224P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y; Xeon 6517P rivals EPYC 9554.

Feature	EPYC Embedded 8224P	Xeon 6517P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC Embedded 8224P was priced at $855, while the Xeon 6517P came in at $1195. On launch pricing ($855 vs $1195), EPYC Embedded 8224P was $340 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC Embedded 8224P delivers 57.2 pts/$ vs 40.8 pts/$ for the Xeon 6517P — making the EPYC Embedded 8224P the 33.3% better value option.

Feature	EPYC Embedded 8224P	Xeon 6517P
MSRP	$855-28%	$1195
Performance per Dollar	57.2+40%	40.8
Release Date	2023	2025

Search EPYC Embedded 8224P on Amazon

Search Xeon 6517P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.