Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
Xeon Platinum 8368
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs Xeon Platinum 8368 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs Xeon Platinum 8368 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs Xeon Platinum 8368: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $715 less on MSRP ($6,499 MSRP vs $7,214 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 14.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.6 vs 12.8 PassMark/$ ($6,499 MSRP vs $7,214 MSRP).
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Platinum 8368
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 270W instead of 280W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (20,000 vs 66,403).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.8 vs 14.6 PassMark/$ ($7,214 MSRP vs $6,499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX better than Xeon Platinum 8368?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs Xeon Platinum 8368 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 94,737 points. Launch price was $6,499.
Xeon Platinum 8368
The Xeon Platinum 8368 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 92,054 points. Launch price was $7,214.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8368 offers 38 cores / 76 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX has 26 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8368 — a 27.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX uses the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8368 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX scores 94,737 against the Xeon Platinum 8368's 92,054 — a 2.9% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 66,403 vs 20,000 (107.4% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,500 vs 1,961, a 26.6% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8368 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 20,000 vs 25,000 (22.2% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8368). L3 cache: 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs 57 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8368.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX | Xeon Platinum 8368 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+68% | 38 / 76 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+32% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+13% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB+349% | 57 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+51100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Chagall PRO (2022) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 94,737+3% | 92,054 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 66,403+232% | 20,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,500 | 1,961+31% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 20,000 | 25,000+25% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8368 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon Platinum 8368 supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8368) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8368).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX | Xeon Platinum 8368 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sWRX8 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB | 6 TB+200% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+100% | 64 |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon Platinum 8368 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8368). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX targets Professional Workstation, Xeon Platinum 8368 targets Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX rivals Xeon w9-3495X; Xeon Platinum 8368 rivals EPYC 7543.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX | Xeon Platinum 8368 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Professional Workstation | Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX was priced at $6499, while the Xeon Platinum 8368 came in at $7214. On launch pricing ($6499 vs $7214), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX was $715 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX delivers 14.6 pts/$ vs 12.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8368 — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX the 13.3% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX | Xeon Platinum 8368 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6499-10% | $7214 |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.6+14% | 12.8 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Xeon Platinum 8368
