EPYC 9474F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

AMD

EPYC 9474F

48 Cores96 Thrd360 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2022
EPYC family
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

64 Cores128 Thrd280 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2022

EPYC 9474F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9474F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9474F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9474F

2022

Why buy it

  • +7.9% higher PassMark.
  • Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • 4.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $6,780 MSRPvs$6,499 MSRP
  • 28.6% higher power demand at 360W vs 280W.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

2022

Why buy it

  • Costs $281 less on MSRP ($6,499 MSRP vs $6,780 MSRP).
  • Draws 280W instead of 360W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (94,737 vs 102,255).
  • Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while EPYC 9474F moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9474F better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is ahead with a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9474F pulls ahead with 7.9% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9474F is the stronger fit. You are getting 7.9% better PassMark, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 9474F is the better buy right now. EPYC 9474F comes in 4.3% more expensive on MSRP at $6,780 MSRP versus $6,499 MSRP, and it still gives you 7.9% better PassMark. The compromise is that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 3.5% better value on MSRP (15.1 vs 14.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9474F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of sWRX8 and more multi-core headroom with 48 cores / 96 threads instead of 64/128. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 9474F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 9474F

The EPYC 9474F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 102,255 points. Launch price was $6,780.

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 94,737 points. Launch price was $6,499.

Processing Power

The EPYC 9474F packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9474F versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX — a 9.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 9474F uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9474F scores 102,255 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX's 94,737 — a 7.6% lead for the EPYC 9474F. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9474F vs 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX.

FeatureEPYC 9474FRyzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
Cores / Threads
48 / 96
64 / 128+33%
Boost Clock
4.1 GHz
4.5 GHz+10%
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+33%
2.7 GHz
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)
256 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
512K (per core)+51100%
Process
5 nm, 6 nm-29%
7 nm
Architecture
Genoa (2022−2023)
Chagall PRO (2022)
PassMark
102,255+8%
94,737
Cinebench R23 Multi
66,403
Geekbench 6 Single
1,500
Geekbench 6 Multi
20,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9474F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9474F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX — the EPYC 9474F supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9474F supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 2048 GB 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9474F) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9474F) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX).

FeatureEPYC 9474FRyzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
Socket
SP5
sWRX8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800+50%
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
6 TB+200%
2048 GB
RAM Channels
12+50%
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9474F) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX). Primary use case: EPYC 9474F targets Data Center / Performance Optimized, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9474F rivals Xeon 8461V; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX rivals Xeon w9-3495X.

FeatureEPYC 9474FRyzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
Integrated GPU
No
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
true
Target Use
Data Center / Performance Optimized
Professional Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9474F was priced at $6780, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX came in at $6499. On launch pricing ($6780 vs $6499), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX was $281 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9474F delivers 15.1 pts/$ vs 14.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX — making the EPYC 9474F the 3.4% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9474FRyzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
MSRP
$6780
$6499-4%
Performance per Dollar
15.1+3%
14.6
Release Date
2022
2022

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.