EPYC 9474F
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
EPYC 9474F vs Ryzen Threadripper 7970X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9474F vs Ryzen Threadripper 7970X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9474F vs Ryzen Threadripper 7970X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9474F
2022Why buy it
- ✅+3.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅39.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 92) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 7970X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.1 vs 39.7 PassMark/$ ($6,780 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,281 less on MSRP ($2,499 MSRP vs $6,780 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 163.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 39.7 vs 15.1 PassMark/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $6,780 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (99,152 vs 102,255).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper 7970X better than EPYC 9474F?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9474F vs Ryzen Threadripper 7970X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9474F
The EPYC 9474F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 102,255 points. Launch price was $6,780.
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
The Ryzen Threadripper 7970X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 99,152 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9474F packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 9474F has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9474F versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X — a 25.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 4 GHz). The EPYC 9474F uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9474F scores 102,255 against the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X's 99,152 — a 3.1% lead for the EPYC 9474F. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9474F vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X.
| Feature | EPYC 9474F | Ryzen Threadripper 7970X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 48 / 96+50% | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz | 5.3 GHz+29% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 4 GHz+11% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+100% | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Storm Peak (2023) |
| PassMark | 102,255+3% | 99,152 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 75,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,900 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 24,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9474F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9474F versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X — the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X supports 8.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9474F supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9474F) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 7970X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9474F) vs 92 (Ryzen Threadripper 7970X) — the EPYC 9474F offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9474F) and TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper 7970X).
| Feature | EPYC 9474F | Ryzen Threadripper 7970X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-5200+8% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+500% | 1024 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+200% | 4 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+39% | 92 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9474F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 7970X). Primary use case: EPYC 9474F targets Data Center / Performance Optimized, Ryzen Threadripper 7970X targets High-End Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9474F rivals Xeon 8461V; Ryzen Threadripper 7970X rivals Xeon w7-2495X.
| Feature | EPYC 9474F | Ryzen Threadripper 7970X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Data Center / Performance Optimized | High-End Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9474F was priced at $6780, while the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X came in at $2499. On launch pricing ($6780 vs $2499), Ryzen Threadripper 7970X was $4281 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9474F delivers 15.1 pts/$ vs 39.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X — making the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X the 89.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9474F | Ryzen Threadripper 7970X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6780 | $2499-63% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.1 | 39.7+163% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9474F and Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
