EPYC 9474F vs Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
EPYC 9474F
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9474F
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9474F | Ryzen Threadripper 7970X |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,723) | ✅ More affordable ($2,200) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm) | ✨ Modern (Storm Peak (2023) / 5 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9474F | Ryzen Threadripper 7970X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+64%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,723) | ✅ More affordable ($2,200) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9474F and Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
EPYC 9474F
The EPYC 9474F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 102,255 points. Launch price was $6,780.
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
The Ryzen Threadripper 7970X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 99,152 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9474F packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 9474F has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9474F versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X — a 25.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 4 GHz). The EPYC 9474F uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9474F scores 102,255 against the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X's 99,152 — a 3.1% lead for the EPYC 9474F. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9474F vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X.
| Feature | EPYC 9474F | Ryzen Threadripper 7970X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 48 / 96+50% | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz | 5.3 GHz+29% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 4 GHz+11% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+100% | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Storm Peak (2023) |
| PassMark | 102,255+3% | 99,152 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 75,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,900 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 24,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9474F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper 7970X supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 197.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9474F) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 7970X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9474F) vs 92 (Ryzen Threadripper 7970X) — the EPYC 9474F offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9474F) and TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper 7970X).
| Feature | EPYC 9474F | Ryzen Threadripper 7970X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+500% | 1024 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+200% | 4 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+39% | 92 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9474F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 7970X). Primary use case: EPYC 9474F targets Data Center / Performance Optimized, Ryzen Threadripper 7970X targets High-End Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9474F rivals Xeon 8461V; Ryzen Threadripper 7970X rivals Xeon w7-2495X.
| Feature | EPYC 9474F | Ryzen Threadripper 7970X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Data Center / Performance Optimized | High-End Workstation |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9474F launched at $6780 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X debuted at $2499. At current prices ($3723 vs $2200), the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X is $1523 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9474F delivers 27.5 pts/$ vs 45.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X — making the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X the 48.5% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9474F | Ryzen Threadripper 7970X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6780 | $2499-63% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3723 | $2200-41% |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.5 | 45.1+64% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9474F and Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
