EPYC 9474F vs Xeon 6747P

EPYC 9474F vs Xeon 6747P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9474F

48 / 96

102,255

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

Xeon 6747P

48 / 96

101,685

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9474F vs Xeon 6747P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9474F vs Xeon 6747P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9474F

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
4.4% HIGHER MSRP
$6,780 MSRPvs$6,497 MSRP
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon 6747P

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $283 less on MSRP ($6,497 MSRP vs $6,780 MSRP).
✅Draws 330W instead of 360W, a 30W reduction.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9474F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (101,685 vs 102,255).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9474F better than Xeon 6747P?

Yes. EPYC 9474F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 22.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9474F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 22.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9474F is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9474F is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon 6747P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 9474F comes in 4.4% more expensive on MSRP at $6,780 MSRP versus $6,497 MSRP, and it still gives you a 22.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon 6747P is also 3.8% better value on MSRP (15.7 vs 15.1 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6747P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9474F vs Xeon 6747P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9474F

The EPYC 9474F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 102,255 points. Launch price was $6,780.

Xeon 6747P

The Xeon 6747P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 330 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 101,685 points. Launch price was $6,497.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 9474F and Xeon 6747P share an identical 48-core/96-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9474F versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon 6747P — a 5% clock advantage for the EPYC 9474F (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 9474F uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon 6747P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9474F scores 102,255 against the Xeon 6747P's 101,685 — a 0.6% lead for the EPYC 9474F. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9474F vs 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6747P.

Feature	EPYC 9474F	Xeon 6747P
Cores / Threads	48 / 96	48 / 96
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+5%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+33%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	288 MB (total)+13%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm, 6 nm	Intel 3 nm-40%
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	102,255	101,685
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,000
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	45,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9474F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6747P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9474F versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6747P — the Xeon 6747P supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9474F supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9474F) vs 8 (Xeon 6747P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9474F) vs 88 (Xeon 6747P) — the EPYC 9474F offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9474F) and C741 (Xeon 6747P).

Feature	EPYC 9474F	Xeon 6747P
Socket	SP5	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-6400+33%
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+50%	4096 GB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+45%	88

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9474F) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6747P). Primary use case: EPYC 9474F targets Data Center / Performance Optimized, Xeon 6747P targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9474F rivals Xeon 8461V; Xeon 6747P rivals EPYC 9555.

Feature	EPYC 9474F	Xeon 6747P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Data Center / Performance Optimized	High Performance Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9474F was priced at $6780, while the Xeon 6747P came in at $6497. On launch pricing ($6780 vs $6497), Xeon 6747P was $283 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9474F delivers 15.1 pts/$ vs 15.7 pts/$ for the Xeon 6747P — making the Xeon 6747P the 3.7% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9474F	Xeon 6747P
MSRP	$6780	$6497-4%
Performance per Dollar	15.1	15.7+4%
Release Date	2022	2025

Search EPYC 9474F on Amazon

Search Xeon 6747P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.