EPYC 9474F vs Xeon w9-3595X
EPYC 9474F
Xeon w9-3595X
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9474F
Performance Per Dollar Xeon w9-3595X
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9474F | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($3,723) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($6,000) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm) | ✨ Modern (Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9474F | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+69%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($3,723) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($6,000) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9474F and Xeon w9-3595X
EPYC 9474F
The EPYC 9474F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 102,255 points. Launch price was $6,780.
Xeon w9-3595X
The Xeon w9-3595X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 60 cores and 120 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 112.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 385 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 97,534 points. Launch price was $5,889.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9474F packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Xeon w9-3595X offers 60 cores / 120 threads — the Xeon w9-3595X has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9474F versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3595X — a 15.7% clock advantage for the Xeon w9-3595X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 9474F uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon w9-3595X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9474F scores 102,255 against the Xeon w9-3595X's 97,534 — a 4.7% lead for the EPYC 9474F. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9474F vs 112.5 MB on the Xeon w9-3595X.
| Feature | EPYC 9474F | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 48 / 96 | 60 / 120+25% |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz | 4.8 GHz+17% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+80% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+128% | 112.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 102,255+5% | 97,534 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 130,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 17,118 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9474F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w9-3595X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Xeon w9-3595X supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 199.4% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9474F) vs 8 (Xeon w9-3595X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9474F) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3595X) — the EPYC 9474F offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9474F) and W790 (Xeon w9-3595X).
| Feature | EPYC 9474F | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+50% | 4096 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+14% | 112 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9474F) vs true (Xeon w9-3595X). Primary use case: EPYC 9474F targets Data Center / Performance Optimized, Xeon w9-3595X targets High-end Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9474F rivals Xeon 8461V; Xeon w9-3595X rivals Threadripper PRO 7985WX.
| Feature | EPYC 9474F | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | true |
| Target Use | Data Center / Performance Optimized | High-end Workstation |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9474F launched at $6780 MSRP, while the Xeon w9-3595X debuted at $5889. At current prices ($3723 vs $6000), the EPYC 9474F is $2277 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9474F delivers 27.5 pts/$ vs 16.3 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3595X — making the EPYC 9474F the 51.3% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9474F | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6780 | $5889-13% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3723-38% | $6000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.5+69% | 16.3 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9474F and Xeon w9-3595X
