EPYC 9474F vs EPYC 9654
EPYC 9474F
EPYC 9654
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9474F
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9654
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9474F | EPYC 9654 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($3,723) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($5,345) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm) | ✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9474F | EPYC 9654 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+23%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($3,723) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($5,345) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9474F and EPYC 9654
EPYC 9474F
The EPYC 9474F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 102,255 points. Launch price was $6,780.
EPYC 9654
The EPYC 9654 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 119,246 points. Launch price was $11,805.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9474F packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the EPYC 9654 offers 96 cores / 192 threads — the EPYC 9654 has 48 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9474F versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9654 — a 10.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9474F (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). Both are built on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture using a 5 nm, 6 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 9474F scores 102,255 against the EPYC 9654's 119,246 — a 15.3% lead for the EPYC 9654. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9474F vs 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9654.
| Feature | EPYC 9474F | EPYC 9654 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 48 / 96 | 96 / 192+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz+11% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+50% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 384 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 102,255 | 119,246+17% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,250 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 20,000 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. Both support up to 6 TB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9474F) and SP5 (EPYC 9654).
| Feature | EPYC 9474F | EPYC 9654 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB | 6 TB |
| RAM Channels | 12 | 12 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9474F targets Data Center / Performance Optimized, EPYC 9654 targets Data Center. Direct competitor: EPYC 9474F rivals Xeon 8461V; EPYC 9654 rivals Xeon 8592+.
| Feature | EPYC 9474F | EPYC 9654 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | AMD-V, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | Data Center / Performance Optimized | Data Center |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9474F launched at $6780 MSRP, while the EPYC 9654 debuted at $11805. At current prices ($3723 vs $5345), the EPYC 9474F is $1622 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9474F delivers 27.5 pts/$ vs 22.3 pts/$ for the EPYC 9654 — making the EPYC 9474F the 20.7% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9474F | EPYC 9654 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6780-43% | $11805 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3723-30% | $5345 |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.5+23% | 22.3 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9474F and EPYC 9654
