EPYC 9474F vs EPYC 9554P

AMD

EPYC 9474F

48 Cores96 Thrd360 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2022
EPYC family
·······
VS
AMD

EPYC 9554P

64 Cores128 Thrd360 WWMax: 3.75 GHz2022
EPYC family
·······

EPYC 9474F vs EPYC 9554P Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9474F vs EPYC 9554P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9474F vs EPYC 9554P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9474F

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +16.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $324 less on MSRP ($6,780 MSRP vs $7,104 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (102,255 vs 104,920).

EPYC 9554P

2022

Why buy it

  • +2.6% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9474F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 4.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $7,104 MSRPvs$6,780 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9554P better than EPYC 9474F?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 9474F is ahead with a 16.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9554P pulls ahead with 2.6% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9554P is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.6% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 9554P is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 9474F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 9554P comes in 4.8% more expensive on MSRP at $7,104 MSRP versus $6,780 MSRP, and it still gives you 2.6% better PassMark. The compromise is that EPYC 9474F is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 16.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 9474F is also 2.1% better value on MSRP (15.1 vs 14.8 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9554P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 64 cores / 128 threads instead of 48/96. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 9474F vs EPYC 9554P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 9474F

The EPYC 9474F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 102,255 points. Launch price was $6,780.

AMD

EPYC 9554P

The EPYC 9554P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.75 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 104,920 points. Launch price was $7,104.

Processing Power

The EPYC 9474F packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the EPYC 9554P offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 9554P has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9474F versus 3.75 GHz on the EPYC 9554P — a 8.9% clock advantage for the EPYC 9474F (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). Both are built on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture using a 5 nm, 6 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 9474F scores 102,255 against the EPYC 9554P's 104,920 — a 2.6% lead for the EPYC 9554P. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureEPYC 9474FEPYC 9554P
Cores / Threads
48 / 96
64 / 128+33%
Boost Clock
4.1 GHz+9%
3.75 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+16%
3.1 GHz
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)
256 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
5 nm, 6 nm
5 nm, 6 nm
Architecture
Genoa (2022−2023)
Genoa (2022−2023)
PassMark
102,255
104,920+3%
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. Both support up to 6 TB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9474F) and SP5 (EPYC 9554P).

FeatureEPYC 9474FEPYC 9554P
Socket
SP5
SP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
6 TB
6 TB
RAM Channels
12
12
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9474F targets Data Center / Performance Optimized, EPYC 9554P targets Data Center / Single Socket. Direct competitor: EPYC 9474F rivals Xeon 8461V; EPYC 9554P rivals Xeon 8468.

FeatureEPYC 9474FEPYC 9554P
Integrated GPU
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
Target Use
Data Center / Performance Optimized
Data Center / Single Socket
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9474F was priced at $6780, while the EPYC 9554P came in at $7104. On launch pricing ($6780 vs $7104), EPYC 9474F was $324 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9474F delivers 15.1 pts/$ vs 14.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 9554P — making the EPYC 9474F the 2.1% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9474FEPYC 9554P
MSRP
$6780-5%
$7104
Performance per Dollar
15.1+2%
14.8
Release Date
2022
2022

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.