Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX vs Core i5-10400F
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
Core i5-10400F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-10400F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,782) | ✅ More affordable ($102) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Storm Peak (2023) / 5 nm) | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+332%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,782) | ✅ More affordable ($102) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and Core i5-10400F
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 82,268 points. Launch price was $2,649.
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 20.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX uses the Storm Peak (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX scores 82,268 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 145.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 38,000 vs 8,191 (129.1% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,686 vs 1,454, a 59.5% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 23,294 vs 5,783 (120.4% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+300% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+23% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+45% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+967% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+300% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-64% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Storm Peak (2023) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 82,268+531% | 13,029 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 38,000+364% | 8,191 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,686+85% | 1,454 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 23,294+303% | 5,783 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX uses the sTR5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX) vs 2 (Core i5-10400F). PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX) vs 16 (Core i5-10400F) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX offers 112 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sTR5 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200+25% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB+1500% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+700% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX launched at $2649 MSRP, while the Core i5-10400F debuted at $160. At current prices ($2782 vs $102), the Core i5-10400F is $2680 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX delivers 29.6 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400F — making the Core i5-10400F the 124.8% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2649 | $160-94% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2782 | $102-96% |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.6 | 127.7+331% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and Core i5-10400F
