Radeon HD 2400
VS
Mobility Radeon HD 2300

Radeon HD 2400 vs Mobility Radeon HD 2300

AMD

Radeon HD 2400

2009Core: 850 MHz
VS
AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 2300

2010Core: 700 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 2400 is positioned at rank 323 and the Mobility Radeon HD 2300 is on rank 721, so the Radeon HD 2400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 2400

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
4741%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
4555%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
4502%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
4494%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
4485%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
4459%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
4403%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
4387%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
4346%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
4335%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
4282%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
4273%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
4196%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
4193%
#308
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
5229%
#323
Radeon HD 2400
MSRP: $79|Avg: $10
100%
#324
Radeon HD 2400 XT
MSRP: $79|Avg: $10
99%
#326
GeForce 7300 GT
MSRP: $89|Avg: $20
91%
#327
Radeon HD 3870 X2
MSRP: $449|Avg: $40
86%
#329
GeForce 7950 GT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $50
76%
#330
RADEON X550XT
MSRP: $50|Avg: $40
73%
#334
Radeon X1650 Pro
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
56%
#336
RADEON X550
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
56%
#337
Radeon HD 8350
MSRP: $200|Avg: $39
54%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 2300

#711
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
21288%
#713
19298%
#714
19247%
#718
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
17502%
#719
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
17382%
#721
Mobility Radeon HD 2300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
100%
#722
GeForce 7800 GTX
MSRP: $599|Avg: $40
88%
#723
RADEON 9600SE
MSRP: $65|Avg: $65
82%
#724
Radeon X1200
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
80%
#725
Radeon 2100
MSRP: $149|Avg: $49
78%
#726
GeForce 6800
MSRP: $299|Avg: $50
75%
#727
Radeon 3100
MSRP: $199|Avg: $30
73%
#728
GeForce 6800 GT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $40
71%
#729
GeForce 7950 GX2
MSRP: $599|Avg: $80
67%
#730
Mobility Radeon X1450
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
65%
#731
MOBILITY RADEON X1800
MSRP: $399|Avg: $50
65%
#732
MOBILITY RADEON 9550
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
59%
#733
MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP
MSRP: $20|Avg: $5
59%
#734
GeForce 6200
MSRP: $129|Avg: $10
57%
#736
GeForce FX 5500
MSRP: $37|Avg: $30
43%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 2400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 137.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon HD 2300.

InsightRadeon HD 2400Mobility Radeon HD 2300
Performance
Leading raw performance (+137.3%)
Lower raw frame rates (-137.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon HD 2400 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 2400 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $15), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 255.9% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 2400Mobility Radeon HD 2300
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+255.9%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($10)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 2400 and Mobility Radeon HD 2300

AMD

Radeon HD 2400

The Radeon HD 2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 2 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 121 points. Launch price was $249.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 2300

The Mobility Radeon HD 2300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 2400 scores 121 versus the Mobility Radeon HD 2300's 51 — the Radeon HD 2400 leads by 137.3%. The Radeon HD 2400 is built on TeraScale while the Mobility Radeon HD 2300 uses TeraScale 2, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 2400) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 2300). Raw compute: 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2400) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 2300).

FeatureRadeon HD 2400Mobility Radeon HD 2300
G3D Mark Score
121+137%
51
Architecture
TeraScale
TeraScale 2
Process Node
55 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
800
800
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.36 TFLOPS+21%
1.12 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40
40
L1 Cache
160 KB+100%
80 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 2400Mobility Radeon HD 2300
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureRadeon HD 2400Mobility Radeon HD 2300
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 2400 draws 190W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 2300's 50W — a 116.7% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 2300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 2400) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 2300). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 2400Mobility Radeon HD 2300
TDP
190W
50W-74%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
0.6
1.0+67%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 2400 launched at $79 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Mobility Radeon HD 2300 launched at $100 and now averages $15. The Radeon HD 2400 costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 12.1 (Radeon HD 2400) vs 3.4 (Mobility Radeon HD 2300) — the Radeon HD 2400 offers 255.9% better value. The Mobility Radeon HD 2300 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2009).

FeatureRadeon HD 2400Mobility Radeon HD 2300
MSRP
$79-21%
$100
Avg Price (30d)
$10-33%
$15
Performance per Dollar
12.1+256%
3.4
Codename
RV790
Broadway
Release
April 2 2009
January 7 2010
Ranking
#762
#846