
Sempron 2600+ vs Atom N280

Sempron 2600+

Atom N280
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Sempron 2600+ is positioned at rank 1000 and the Atom N280 is on rank 367, so the Atom N280 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Sempron 2600+
Performance Per Dollar Atom N280
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Sempron 2600+ | Atom N280 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Palermo (2001−2005) / 130 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (DiamondVille (2008−2009) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Sempron 2600+ | Atom N280 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Sempron 2600+ and Atom N280

Sempron 2600+
The Sempron 2600+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 291 points. Launch price was $60.

Atom N280
The Atom N280 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the DiamondVille (2008−2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PBGA437. Thermal design power (TDP): 2.5 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 285 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Sempron 2600+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, matching the Atom N280's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Sempron 2600+ versus 0.07 GHz on the Atom N280 — a 185.3% clock advantage for the Sempron 2600+. The Sempron 2600+ uses the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Atom N280 uses DiamondVille (2008−2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Sempron 2600+ scores 291 against the Atom N280's 285 — a 2.1% lead for the Sempron 2600+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Sempron 2600+ | Atom N280 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.83 GHz+2514% | 0.07 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 1.66 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256K | 512 kB+100% |
| Process | 130 nm | 45 nm-65% |
| Architecture | Palermo (2001−2005) | DiamondVille (2008−2009) |
| PassMark | 291+2% | 285 |
Memory & Platform
The Sempron 2600+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom N280 uses PBGA437 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Sempron 2600+ | Atom N280 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 754 | PBGA437 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR2-533 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 2 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 1 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












