Radeon HD 2600 XT vs Quadro FX 2800M

AMD

Radeon HD 2600 XT

2013Core: 725 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 2800M

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 2600 XT vs Quadro FX 2800M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 2600 XT vs Quadro FX 2800M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 2600 XT vs Quadro FX 2800M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 2600 XT

2013

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 25W instead of 189W, a 164W reduction.
  • More future proof: TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 2800M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 2800M

2008

Why buy it

  • 85.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • 656% higher power demand at 189W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro FX 2800M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 85.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 46.6% in PassMark G3D (415 vs 283), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 2600 XT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 40nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 2600 XT makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro FX 2800M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon HD 2600 XT vs Quadro FX 2800M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 2600 XT

The Radeon HD 2600 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2013. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 283 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 2800M

The Quadro FX 2800M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 415 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 2600 XT scores 283 versus the Quadro FX 2800M's 415 — the Quadro FX 2800M leads by 46.6%. The Radeon HD 2600 XT is built on TeraScale 2 while the Quadro FX 2800M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs 240 (Quadro FX 2800M). Raw compute: 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 2800M).

FeatureRadeon HD 2600 XTQuadro FX 2800M
G3D Mark Score
283
415+47%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
40 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
480+100%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.696 TFLOPS+12%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
24
80+233%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 2600 XTQuadro FX 2800M
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 2600 XT has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 2800M carries 1 GB. Quadro FX 2800M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 2600 XT and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 2800M.

FeatureRadeon HD 2600 XTQuadro FX 2800M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 2600 XT draws 25W versus the Quadro FX 2800M's 189W — a 153.3% difference. The Radeon HD 2600 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs 350W (Quadro FX 2800M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 2600 XTQuadro FX 2800M
TDP
25W-87%
189W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
11.3+414%
2.2
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon HD 2600 XT (2013 vs 2008).

FeatureRadeon HD 2600 XTQuadro FX 2800M
MSRP
$199
Codename
Thames
GT200B
Release
January 7 2013
November 11 2008
Ranking
#883
#815

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.