Sempron 2600+ vs Celeron 2.10
Sempron 2600+
Celeron 2.10
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Sempron 2600+ is positioned at rank 1000 and the Celeron 2.10 is on rank 1066, so the Sempron 2600+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Sempron 2600+
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 2.10
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Sempron 2600+ | Celeron 2.10 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($49) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Palermo (2001−2005) / 130 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Northwood (2002−2004) / 130 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Sempron 2600+ | Celeron 2.10 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($49) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Sempron 2600+ and Celeron 2.10
Sempron 2600+
The Sempron 2600+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 291 points. Launch price was $60.
Celeron 2.10
The Celeron 2.10 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 285 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Sempron 2600+ and Celeron 2.10 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Sempron 2600+ versus 2.1 GHz on the Celeron 2.10 — a 13.7% clock advantage for the Celeron 2.10. The Sempron 2600+ uses the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Celeron 2.10 uses Northwood (2002−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Sempron 2600+ scores 291 against the Celeron 2.10's 285 — a 2.1% lead for the Sempron 2600+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Sempron 2600+ | Celeron 2.10 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.83 GHz | 2.1 GHz+15% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256K+100% | 128 kB |
| Process | 130 nm | 130 nm |
| Architecture | Palermo (2001−2005) | Northwood (2002−2004) |
| PassMark | 291+2% | 285 |
Memory & Platform
The Sempron 2600+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 2.10 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Sempron 2600+ | Celeron 2.10 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 754 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR1-400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 1 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Sempron 2600+) / No (Celeron 2.10). Primary use case: Celeron 2.10 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2.10 rivals Pentium 4 2.40.
| Feature | Sempron 2600+ | Celeron 2.10 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | No |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Sempron 2600+ and Celeron 2.10
