Sempron 3200+ vs Celeron 2.60
Sempron 3200+
Celeron 2.60
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Sempron 3200+ is positioned at rank 943 and the Celeron 2.60 is on rank 1045, so the Sempron 3200+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Sempron 3200+
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 2.60
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Sempron 3200+ | Celeron 2.60 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Palermo (2001−2005) / 90 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Northwood (2002−2004) / 130 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Sempron 3200+ | Celeron 2.60 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Sempron 3200+ and Celeron 2.60
Sempron 3200+
The Sempron 3200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 October 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 391 points. Launch price was $13.
Celeron 2.60
The Celeron 2.60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 385 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Sempron 3200+ and Celeron 2.60 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Sempron 3200+ versus 2.6 GHz on the Celeron 2.60 — a 36.4% clock advantage for the Celeron 2.60. The Sempron 3200+ uses the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Celeron 2.60 uses Northwood (2002−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Sempron 3200+ scores 391 against the Celeron 2.60's 385 — a 1.5% lead for the Sempron 3200+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Sempron 3200+ | Celeron 2.60 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.8 GHz | 2.6 GHz+44% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB+100% | 128 kB |
| Process | 90 nm-31% | 130 nm |
| Architecture | Palermo (2001−2005) | Northwood (2002−2004) |
| PassMark | 391+2% | 385 |
Memory & Platform
The Sempron 3200+ uses the 939 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 2.60 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Sempron 3200+ | Celeron 2.60 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 939 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR2-400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 1 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Sempron 3200+) / No (Celeron 2.60). Primary use case: Celeron 2.60 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2.60 rivals Pentium 4 2.40.
| Feature | Sempron 3200+ | Celeron 2.60 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | No |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Sempron 3200+ and Celeron 2.60
