Sempron 3200+
VS
Athlon 64 2600+

Sempron 3200+ vs Athlon 64 2600+

AMD

Sempron 3200+

1 Cores1 Thrd62 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2005
VS
AMD

Athlon 64 2600+

1 Cores1 Thrd15 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Sempron 3200+ is positioned at rank 943 and the Athlon 64 2600+ is on rank 1080, so the Sempron 3200+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Sempron 3200+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
23923%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
22605%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
16413%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4945%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3917%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3426%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1962%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1937%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1763%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1763%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1744%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1697%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1673%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1666%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1651%
#943
Sempron 3200+
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#944
Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition
MSRP: $990|Avg: $175
100%
#946
Core i5-650
MSRP: $176|Avg: $22
98%
#947
Phenom X3 8600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
97%
#948
A10-6790B
MSRP: $122|Avg: $50
97%
#949
Core i3-6100TE
MSRP: $250|Avg: $90
97%
#950
FX-4320
MSRP: $250|Avg: $100
97%
#951
Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition
MSRP: $990|Avg: $150
97%
#952
Celeron E1200
MSRP: $53|Avg: $98
96%
#954
Core i5-660
MSRP: $196|Avg: $150
95%
#955
Athlon II X2 250
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
95%
#956
Core i3-2120T
MSRP: $127|Avg: $38
95%
#957
Phenom II X3 720
MSRP: $130|Avg: $64
94%
#958
Pentium E6300
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 2600+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
79519%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
75138%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
54556%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
16435%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
13019%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
11389%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
6523%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
6438%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
5862%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
5861%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
5796%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
5639%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
5560%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
5538%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
5488%
#1080
Athlon 64 2600+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
100%
#1081
Celeron 2.20
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
98%
#1082
Athlon 64 X2 4000+
MSRP: $328|Avg: $10
91%
#1083
Athlon 64 X2 5200+
MSRP: $420|Avg: $15
91%
#1084
Core i7-975
MSRP: $999|Avg: $50
90%
#1085
Athlon XP 2600+
MSRP: $98|Avg: $10
89%
#1086
Core i7-965
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $40
87%
#1087
Athlon 64 FX-74
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
85%
#1088
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
84%
#1089
Athlon 64 2000+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
84%
#1090
Athlon 64 X2 5600+
MSRP: $505|Avg: $15
84%
#1091
Athlon 64 X2 5400+
MSRP: $485|Avg: $78
83%
#1092
Celeron 2.30
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
83%
#1093
Phenom X4 9450e
MSRP: $450|Avg: $430
82%
#1094
Athlon 64 X2 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $20
79%
#1095
Athlon 64 3000+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $10
77%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Sempron 3200+ leads in gaming performance. However, the Athlon 64 2600+ is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightSempron 3200+Athlon 64 2600+
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Palermo (2001−2005) / 90 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Lima (2008−2009) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightSempron 3200+Athlon 64 2600+
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Sempron 3200+ and Athlon 64 2600+

AMD

Sempron 3200+

The Sempron 3200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 October 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 391 points. Launch price was $13.

AMD

Athlon 64 2600+

The Athlon 64 2600+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lima (2008−2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 392 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the Sempron 3200+ and Athlon 64 2600+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Sempron 3200+ versus 1.6 GHz on the Athlon 64 2600+ — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Sempron 3200+. The Sempron 3200+ uses the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Athlon 64 2600+ uses Lima (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Sempron 3200+ scores 391 against the Athlon 64 2600+'s 392 — a 0.3% lead for the Athlon 64 2600+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureSempron 3200+Athlon 64 2600+
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz+12%
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB
512 kB+100%
Process
90 nm
65 nm-28%
Architecture
Palermo (2001−2005)
Lima (2008−2009)
PassMark
391
392
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Sempron 3200+ uses the 939 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon 64 2600+ uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureSempron 3200+Athlon 64 2600+
Socket
939
AM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0