CPU
GPU
Sempron 3200+
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Sempron 3200+ is positioned at rank 943 and the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ is on rank 874, so the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Sempron 3200+
Performance Per Dollar Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Sempron 3200+ | Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Palermo (2001−2005) / 90 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Clawhammer (2001−2005) / Standard Node) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Sempron 3200+ | Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Path of Exile 2
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Sempron 3200+ and Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
Sempron 3200+
The Sempron 3200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 October 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 391 points. Launch price was $13.
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
The Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Sempron 3200+ and Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Sempron 3200+ versus 1.6 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Sempron 3200+. The Sempron 3200+ uses the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ uses Clawhammer (2001−2005). In PassMark, the Sempron 3200+ scores 391 against the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+'s 405 — a 3.5% lead for the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+.
| Feature | Sempron 3200+ | Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.8 GHz+12% | 1.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB | 512K+100% |
| Process | 90 nm | — |
| Architecture | Palermo (2001−2005) | Clawhammer (2001−2005) |
| PassMark | 391 | 405+4% |
Memory & Platform
The Sempron 3200+ uses the 939 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ uses 754 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Sempron 3200+ | Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 939 | 754 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 2 |
| RAM Channels | — | 1 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Sempron 3200+) / false (Mobile Athlon 64 2700+). Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ rivals Pentium M 715.
| Feature | Sempron 3200+ | Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | false |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Sempron 3200+ and Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
