Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 vs GeForce 9200M GS
Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400
Popular choices:
GeForce 9200M GS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 is positioned at rank 611 and the GeForce 9200M GS is on rank 683, so the Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9200M GS
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 9200M GS is significantly newer (2016 vs 2009). The GeForce 9200M GS likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 9200M GS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 | GeForce 9200M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $40), it costs 75% less, resulting in a 287.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 | GeForce 9200M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+287.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 and GeForce 9200M GS
Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400
The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 125 points.
GeForce 9200M GS
The GeForce 9200M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 129 points.
Graphics Performance
The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 scores 125 and the GeForce 9200M GS reaches 129 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 is built on TeraScale while the GeForce 9200M GS uses Maxwell, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400) vs 256 (GeForce 9200M GS). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400) vs 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 9200M GS).
| Feature | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 | GeForce 9200M GS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 125 | 129+3% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+213% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.88 TFLOPS+73% | 0.5084 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+25% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 | GeForce 9200M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 9200M GS has 256 MB. The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400) vs 1 MB (GeForce 9200M GS) — the GeForce 9200M GS has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 | GeForce 9200M GS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10_1 (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400) vs 10.0 (GeForce 9200M GS). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 1.
| Feature | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 | GeForce 9200M GS |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10_1 | 10.0 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400) vs No (GeForce 9200M GS). Decoder: UVD vs PureVideo HD VP3.
| Feature | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 | GeForce 9200M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD | No |
| Decoder | UVD | PureVideo HD VP3 |
| Codecs | — | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 draws 30W versus the GeForce 9200M GS's 16W — a 60.9% difference. The GeForce 9200M GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400) vs 350W (GeForce 9200M GS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 | GeForce 9200M GS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W | 16W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 1mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 4.2 | 8.1+93% |
Value Analysis
The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the GeForce 9200M GS launched at $100 and now averages $40. The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 costs 75% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 12.5 (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400) vs 3.2 (GeForce 9200M GS) — the Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 offers 290.6% better value. The GeForce 9200M GS is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2009).
| Feature | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 | GeForce 9200M GS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-51% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-75% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.5+291% | 3.2 |
| Codename | M98 | GM108 |
| Release | January 9 2009 | March 25 2016 |
| Ranking | #927 | #864 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 and GeForce 9200M GS
