CPU
GPU
Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400
Popular choices:
RADEON X800 SE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 is positioned at rank 611 and the RADEON X800 SE is on rank 719, so the Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X800 SE
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON X800 SE is significantly newer (2025 vs 2009). The RADEON X800 SE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON X800 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 | RADEON X800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $10 versus $15 for the RADEON X800 SE, it costs 33% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 44.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 | RADEON X800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+44.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 and RADEON X800 SE
Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400
The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 125 points.
RADEON X800 SE
The RADEON X800 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 130 points.
Graphics Performance
The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 scores 125 and the RADEON X800 SE reaches 130 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 is built on TeraScale while the RADEON X800 SE uses RDNA 3.5, both on 55 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 800 (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400) vs 2,560 (RADEON X800 SE). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400) vs 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON X800 SE).
| Feature | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 | RADEON X800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 125 | 130+4% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 2560+220% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.88 TFLOPS | 14.85 TFLOPS+1587% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 40 | 160+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 8 MB+3100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 | RADEON X800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X800 SE has 256 MB. The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400) vs 8 MB (RADEON X800 SE) — the RADEON X800 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 | RADEON X800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 8 MB+3100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10_1 (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400) vs 9_0b (RADEON X800 SE). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 | RADEON X800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10_1+11% | 9_0b |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 draws 30W versus the RADEON X800 SE's 55W — a 58.8% difference. The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400) vs 350W (RADEON X800 SE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 1mm vs 170mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 | RADEON X800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-45% | 55W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 1mm | 170mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 4.2+75% | 2.4 |
Value Analysis
The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the RADEON X800 SE launched at $200 and now averages $15. The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 12.5 (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400) vs 8.7 (RADEON X800 SE) — the Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 offers 43.7% better value. The RADEON X800 SE is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2009).
| Feature | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 | RADEON X800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-76% | $200 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-33% | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.5+44% | 8.7 |
| Codename | M98 | Strix Halo |
| Release | January 9 2009 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #927 | #98 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 and RADEON X800 SE
